Levels of the origin-binding protein Double parked and its inhibitor Geminin increase in response to replication stress

被引:21
作者
May, NR [1 ]
Thomer, M [1 ]
Murnen, KF [1 ]
Calvi, BR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Genet, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
DNA replication; double parked; Cdt1; geminin; genome stability;
D O I
10.1242/jcs.02534
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The regulation of a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) at origins ensures that the genome is replicated only once per cell cycle. Cdt1 is an essential component of the pre-RC that is rapidly degraded at G1-S and also inhibited by Geminin (Gem) protein to prevent re-replication. We have previously shown that destruction of the Drosophila homolog of Cdt1, Double-parked (Dup), at G1-S is dependent upon cyclin-E/CDK2 and important to prevent re-replication and cell death. Dup is phosphorylated by cyclin-E/Cdk2, but this direct phosphorylation was not sufficient to explain the rapid destruction of Dup at G1-S. Here, we present evidence that it is DNA replication itself that triggers rapid Dup destruction. We find that a range of defects in DNA replication stabilize Dup protein and that this stabilization is not dependent on ATM/ATR checkpoint kinases. This response to replication stress was cell-type specific, with neuroblast stem cells of the larval brain having the largest increase in Dup protein. Defects at different steps in replication also increased Dup protein during an S-phase-like amplification cell cycle in the ovary, suggesting that Dup stabilization is sensitive to DNA replication and not an indirect consequence of a cell-cycle arrest. Finally, we find that cells with high levels of Dup also have elevated levels of Gem protein. We propose that, in cycling cells, Dup destruction is coupled to DNA replication and that increased levels of Gem balance elevated Dup levels to prevent pre-RC reformation when Dup degradation fails.
引用
收藏
页码:4207 / 4217
页数:11
相关论文
共 93 条
[71]   The Drosophila ATM homologue Mei-41 has an essential checkpoint function at the midblastula transition [J].
Sibon, OCM ;
Laurençon, A ;
Hawley, RS ;
Theurkauf, WE .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (06) :302-312
[72]   ATM is required for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability during Drosophila development [J].
Silva, E ;
Tiong, S ;
Pedersen, M ;
Homola, E ;
Royou, A ;
Fasulo, B ;
Siriaco, G ;
Campbell, SD .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (15) :1341-1347
[73]   The Drosophila ATM ortholog, dATM, mediates the response to ionizing radiation and to spontaneous DNA damage during development [J].
Song, YH ;
Mirey, G ;
Betson, M ;
Haber, DA ;
Settleman, J .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (15) :1354-1359
[74]  
Spradling AC, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P135
[75]   AMPLIFICATION OF GENES FOR CHORION PROTEINS DURING OOGENESIS IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
SPRADLING, AC ;
MAHOWALD, AP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 77 (02) :1096-1100
[76]   Cdt1 phosphorylation by cyclin A-dependent kinases negatively regulates its function without affecting geminin binding [J].
Sugimoto, N ;
Tatsumi, Y ;
Tsurumi, T ;
Matsukage, A ;
Kiyono, T ;
Nishitani, H ;
Fujita, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 279 (19) :19691-19697
[77]   Repression of origin assembly in metaphase depends on inhibition of RLF-B/Cdt1 by geminin [J].
Tada, S ;
Li, A ;
Maiorano, D ;
Méchali, M ;
Blow, JJ .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 3 (02) :107-113
[78]   Degradation of Cdt1 during S phase is Skp2-independent and is required for efficient progression of mammalian cells through S phase [J].
Takeda, DY ;
Parvin, JD ;
Dutta, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 280 (24) :23416-23423
[79]   Interdependent nuclear accumulation of budding yeast Cdt1 and Mcm2-7 during G1 phase [J].
Tanaka, S ;
Diffley, JFX .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 4 (03) :198-207
[80]   A NON-RADIOACTIVE INSITU HYBRIDIZATION METHOD FOR THE LOCALIZATION OF SPECIFIC RNAS IN DROSOPHILA EMBRYOS REVEALS TRANSLATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SEGMENTATION GENE HUNCHBACK [J].
TAUTZ, D ;
PFEIFLE, C .
CHROMOSOMA, 1989, 98 (02) :81-85