The dimensionality of the remember-know task: A state-trace analysis

被引:159
作者
Dunn, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
recognition memory; state-trace analysis; recollection; familiarity; signal detection theory;
D O I
10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.426
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article addresses the issue of whether the remember-know (RK) task is best explained by a single-process or a dual-process model. All single-process models propose that remember and know responses reflect different levels of a single strength-of-evidence dimension. Thus, across conditions in which response criteria are held constant, these models predict that the RK task is unidimensional. Many dual-process models propose that remember and know responses reflect two qualitatively distinct processes underlying recognition memory, often characterized as recollection and familiarity. These models predict that the RK task is bidimensional. Using data from 37 studies, the author conducted a state-trace analysis to determine the dimensionality of the RK task. In those studies, non-memory-related differences between conditions were eliminated via decision criteria constrained to be constant across all levels of the independent variables. The results reveal little or no evidence of bidimensionality and lend additional support to the unequal-variance signal detection model. Other arguments supporting a bidimensional interpretation are examined, and the author concludes there is insufficient evidence for the RK task to be used to identify qualitatively different memory components.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 446
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   STATE-TRACE ANALYSIS - METHOD OF TESTING SIMPLE THEORIES OF CAUSATION [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 19 (02) :137-181
[2]   The role of the temporal lobes in recognizing visuospatial materials: Remembering versus knowing [J].
Blaxton, TA ;
Theodore, WH .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1997, 35 (01) :5-25
[3]   Remembering and knowing in context [J].
Bodner, GE ;
Lindsay, DS .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 48 (03) :563-580
[4]   Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory [J].
Busey, TA ;
Tunnicliff, J ;
Loftus, GR ;
Loftus, EF .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2000, 7 (01) :26-48
[5]   REMEMBERING, FAMILIARITY, AND SOURCE MONITORING [J].
CONWAY, MA ;
DEWHURST, SA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :125-140
[6]  
CURRAN HV, 1993, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V110, P374
[7]   Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity [J].
Curran, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (08) :1088-1106
[8]   A context noise model of episodic word recognition [J].
Dennis, S ;
Humphreys, MS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (02) :452-478
[9]   PICTURES, IMAGES, AND RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE [J].
DEWHURST, SA ;
CONWAY, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (05) :1088-1098
[10]   Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account [J].
Diana, RA ;
Reder, LM ;
Arndt, J ;
Park, H .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (01) :1-21