Tumor-stroma ratio in the primary tumor is a prognostic factor in early breast cancer patients, especially in triple-negative carcinoma patients

被引:255
作者
de Kruijf, Esther M. [1 ]
van Nes, Johanna G. H. [1 ]
de Velde, Cornelis J. H. van [1 ]
Putter, Hein [2 ]
Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M. [3 ]
Liefers, Gerrit Jan [1 ]
Kuppen, Peter J. K. [1 ]
Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. [1 ]
Mesker, Wilma E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Stroma; Breast cancer; Triple-negative carcinomas; Prognosis; GENE-EXPRESSION SIGNATURE; CLINICAL UTILITY; SURVIVAL; FIBROBLASTS; PROGRESSION; VALIDATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; METASTASIS; PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-010-0855-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Stroma tissue surrounding cancer cells plays an important role in tumor development and behavior. In colorectal cancer, it has been found that the amount of stroma within the primary tumor is of prognostic value. We therefore have evaluated the prognostic value of this tumor-stroma ratio for breast cancer. A cohort of 574 early breast cancer patients, primarily treated with surgery between 1985 and 1994 was analyzed for the tumor-stroma ratio. The percentage of stroma was visually estimated on Haematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) stained histological sections. Patients with more than 50% intra-tumor stroma were quantified as stroma rich and patients with less than 50% as stroma poor. For the total group of patients, stroma-rich tumors had a shorter relapse-free period (RFP) (P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.025) compared to stroma-poor tumors. Tumor-stroma ratio was an independent prognostic parameter for the total group of patients (P < 0.001) and also in stratified analysis based on systemic treatment. Importantly, in the triple-negative cancer subpopulation, patients with stroma-rich tumors had a 2.92 times higher risk of relapse (P = 0.006) compared to those with stroma-poor tumors, independently of other clinico-pathological parameters. Five-year RFP-rates for triple-negative cancer patients with stroma-rich compared to stroma-poor tumors were 56 and 81%, respectively. Tumor-stroma ratio has proven to be an independent prognostic factor for RFP in breast cancer patients and especially in the triple-negative cancer subpopulation. Tumor-stroma ratio could be easily implemented in routine daily pathology diagnostics, as it is simple to determine, reproducible, and performed in quick time.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 696
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer: Review of their clinical utility and current validation in the prospective NNBC-3 trial [J].
Annecke, K. ;
Schmitt, M. ;
Euler, U. ;
Zerm, M. ;
Paepke, D. ;
Paepke, S. ;
von Minckwitz, G. ;
Thomssen, C. ;
Harbeck, N. .
ADVANCES IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 45, 2008, 45 :31-45
[2]
Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry [J].
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Brown, Monica ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1721-1728
[3]
Beck AH, 2008, LAB INVEST, V88, p22A
[4]
Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Loi, Sherene ;
van't Veer, Laura ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Delorenzi, Mauro ;
Glas, Annuska M. ;
d'Assignies, Mahasti Saghatchian ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Lidereau, Rosette ;
Ellis, Paul ;
Harris, Adrian ;
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Therasse, Patrick ;
Floore, Arno ;
Amakrane, Mohamed ;
Piette, Fanny ;
Rutgers, Emiel ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Piccart, Martine J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1183-1192
[5]
Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival [J].
Chang, HY ;
Nuyten, DSA ;
Sneddon, JB ;
Hastie, T ;
Tibshirani, R ;
Sorlie, T ;
Dai, HY ;
He, YDD ;
van't Veer, LJ ;
Bartelink, H ;
van de Rijn, M ;
Brown, PO ;
van de Vijver, MJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (10) :3738-3743
[6]
DVORAK HF, 1986, NEW ENGL J MED, V315, P1650
[7]
New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression [J].
Egeblad, M ;
Werb, Z .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (03) :161-174
[8]
Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? [J].
Ein-Dor, L ;
Kela, I ;
Getz, G ;
Givol, D ;
Domany, E .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (02) :171-178
[9]
Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer [J].
Fan, Cheng ;
Oh, Daniel S. ;
Wessels, Lodewyk ;
Weigelt, Britta ;
Nuyten, Dimitry S. A. ;
Nobel, Andrew B. ;
van't Veer, Laura J. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (06) :560-569
[10]
Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer [J].
Finak, Greg ;
Bertos, Nicholas ;
Pepin, Francois ;
Sadekova, Svetlana ;
Souleimanova, Margarita ;
Zhao, Hong ;
Chen, Haiying ;
Omeroglu, Gulbeyaz ;
Meterissian, Sarkis ;
Omeroglu, Atilla ;
Hallett, Michael ;
Park, Morag .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2008, 14 (05) :518-527