Accuracy of a noninvasive temporal artery thermometer for use in infants

被引:84
作者
Greenes, DS [1 ]
Fleisher, GR [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Div Emergency Med, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 2001年 / 155卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.155.3.376
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of a new noninvasive temporal artery (TA) thermometer in infants; to compare the accuracy of the TA thermometer with that of a tympanic thermometer, using rectal thermometry as the criterion standard; and to compare the tolerability of the TA thermometer with that of the tympanic and rectal thermometers. Design: Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of TA and tympanic thermometry, using rectal thermometry as the criterion standard. getting: Emergency department of an urban pediatric hospital. Subjects: Convenience sample of 304 infants younger than 1 year presenting for care. Main Outcome Measures: Temperatures were measured using TA, tympanic, and rectal thermometers for all infants. Agreement between TA or tympanic and rectal temperatures was assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of TA or tympanic thermometers for detecting rectal fever were determined. Discomfort scores, using a standardized scale, were assessed by trained observers after each temperature measurement was made. Results: Linear regression analysis of the relation between TA and rectal temperatures yielded a model with a slope of 0.79 (vs a slope of 0.68 for tympanic vs rectal temperature; P=.02) and an r of 0.83 (vs r=0.75 for tympanic vs rectal temperature; P<.001). Among 109 patients with a rectal temperature of 38<degrees>C or higher, the TA thermometer had a sensitivity of 0.66 compared with the tympanic thermometer's sensitivity of 0.49 (P<.001). Discomfort scores with TA thermometry were significantly lower than with rectal thermometry (P=.007). Conclusions: The TA thermometer has limited sensitivity for detecting cases of rectal fever in infants. However, the TA thermometer is more accurate than the tympanic thermometer in infants, and it is better tolerated by infants than rectal thermometry.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 381
页数:6
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   RECTAL-AXILLARY TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE IN FEBRILE AND AFEBRILE INFANTS AND CHILDREN [J].
ANAGNOSTAKIS, D ;
MATSANIOTIS, N ;
GRAFAKOS, S ;
SARAFIDOU, E .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1993, 32 (05) :268-272
[2]  
Androkites A L, 1998, J Pediatr Oncol Nurs, V15, P216, DOI 10.1177/104345429801500404
[3]   THE INABILITY OF A TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE PACIFIER TO IDENTIFY FEVERS IN ILL INFANTS [J].
BANCO, L ;
JAYASHEKARAMURTHY, S ;
GRAFFAM, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1988, 142 (02) :171-172
[4]   PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INFANTS AND CHILDREN 0 TO 36 MONTHS OF AGE WITH FEVER WITHOUT SOURCE [J].
BARAFF, LJ ;
BASS, JW ;
FLEISHER, GR ;
KLEIN, JO ;
MCCRACKEN, GH ;
POWELL, KR ;
SCHRIGER, DL .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (07) :1198-1210
[5]  
Barber N, 1989, Pediatr Nurs, V15, P477
[6]  
Beckstrand R L, 1996, Pediatr Nurs, V22, P436
[7]  
Bernardo L M, 1996, J Emerg Nurs, V22, P403, DOI 10.1016/S0099-1767(96)80160-7
[8]   RELIABILITY OF INFRARED TYMPANIC THERMOMETRY IN THE DETECTION OF RECTAL FEVER IN CHILDREN [J].
BRENNAN, DF ;
FALK, JL ;
ROTHROCK, SG ;
KERR, RB .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (01) :21-30
[9]  
Brooks S, 1998, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V19, P333
[10]   COMPARISON OF A TYMPANIC THERMOMETER TO RECTAL AND ORAL THERMOMETERS IN A PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, JM ;
GRANDNER, J ;
RUBINOFF, JL ;
KLEIN, BL ;
WAISMAN, Y ;
HUEY, M .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1991, 30 (04) :24-29