Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment

被引:75
作者
Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Goto, Mika [2 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico Inst Min & Technol, Dept Management, Socorro, NM 87801 USA
[2] Cent Res Inst Elect Power Ind, Komae, Tokyo 2018511, Japan
关键词
Environmental assessment; DEA; Linear programming; Nonlinear programming; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; WILLIAM W. COOPER; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; DEA; PERFORMANCE; RETURNS; SCALE; CONGESTION; INDUSTRY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.10.030
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Environmental assessment recently becomes a very large-scale policy issue among corporate leaders, environmental researchers and individuals who are interested in environmental protection in the world. This study discusses how to apply Data Environment Analysis (DEA) for environmental assessment. DEA has been long utilized to measure operational performance in private and public sectors. However, previous DEA research has documented a limited use of DEA on environmental assessment. A unique feature of DEA-based environmental assessment is that it needs to classify outputs into desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs because private and public entities often produce not only desirable outputs but also undesirable outputs as a result of their production activities. A methodological difficulty associated with the previous DEA-based environmental assessment is how to combine operational performance on desirable outputs and environmental performance on undesirable outputs in a unified treatment. This study proposes two types of unification for DEA-based environmental assessment within a non-radial DEA framework. Then, this study compares the two types of unification from economic and mathematical perspectives of environmental assessment. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 693
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SOCIOECON PLAN SCI
[2]   Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries [J].
Bevilacqua, M ;
Braglia, M .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2002, 10 (01) :85-92
[3]  
Cooper W, 2000, J Prod Anal, V11, P5
[4]   Survey of mathematical programming models in air pollution management [J].
Cooper, WW ;
Hemphill, H ;
Huang, Z ;
Li, S ;
Lelas, V ;
Sullivan, DW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 96 (01) :1-35
[5]   Comparisons and evaluations of alternative approaches to the treatment of congestion in DEA [J].
Cooper, WW ;
Gu, BS ;
Li, SL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 132 (01) :62-74
[6]   Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) [J].
Dyckhoff, H ;
Allen, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 132 (02) :312-325
[7]   New concepts, methodologies and algorithms for business education and research in the 21st century [J].
Dyson, Robert ;
Glover, Fred ;
Ijiri, Yuji ;
Whinston, Andrew ;
Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 48 (03) :427-429
[8]  
Emrouznejad A., 2008, SOC EC PLANNING SCI, V42, P151, DOI [10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002., DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2007.07.002]
[9]   Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science [J].
Glover, Fred ;
Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 197 (01) :1-16
[10]  
Hollander M., 1973, Nonparametric statistical methods