Substrate constraint and adhesive thickness effects on fracture toughness of adhesive joints

被引:53
作者
Duan, K
Hu, XZ
Mai, YW
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Mech Engn, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, CAMT, Sch Aerosp Mech & Mechatron Engn J07, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
adhesive thickness; thickness effect; boundary effect; fracture energy; critical strain energy release rate; plastic zone; fracture process zone;
D O I
10.1163/156856104322746992
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The adhesive thickness effect on fracture behaviour of adhesive joints has been studied using the boundary effect model recently developed for specimen size effect on fracture properties of concrete, and the essential work of fracture model for ligament (uncracked region) effect on large-scale yield of bulk metals and polymers. The leading common mechanism responsible for the nonlinear elastic fracture mechanics behaviours, such as adhesive thickness effect of adhesive joints, specimen size effect of brittle heterogeneous materials and notch dependence of deeply notched metal and polymer specimens, is discussed. These two fracture mechanics models show that the height variation of a fracture process zone (FPZ) or a plastic zone is directly responsible for any change in fracture energy measurements such as the specific fracture energy G(f) and the critical strain energy release rate G(C). Both models show that G(f) is rapidly reduced when the crack-tip approaches the back-face boundary of a specimen because only a limited FPZ or plastic zone height h(FPZ) can be developed in the boundary region. In the case of a thin adhesive joint, the development of a plastic zone height is limited by the thickness of the adhesive sandwiched between the upper and lower adherends or substrates. Consequently, a linear relationship between the adhesive joint toughness and adhesive thickness is established. Test results on adhesive joints from the literature are analysed and compared with the new adhesive joint failure model based on the two well-established fracture mechanics models developed for other material systems.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 53
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
50-FMC RILEM., 1985, Materials and structures, V18, P285, DOI [10.1007/BF02472918, DOI 10.1007/BF02472918]
[2]  
Atkins A.F., 1985, ELASTIC PLASTIC FRAC
[3]   EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON ADHESIVE FRACTURE BEHAVIOR OF AN ELASTOMER EPOXY RESIN [J].
BASCOM, WD ;
COTTINGTON, RL .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1976, 7 (04) :333-346
[4]   FRACTURE OF EPOXY-MODIFIED AND ELASTOMER-MODIFIED EPOXY POLYMERS IN BULK AND AS ADHESIVES [J].
BASCOM, WD ;
COTTINGTON, RL ;
JONES, RL ;
PEYSER, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1975, 19 (09) :2545-2562
[5]   The effect of the substrate material on the value of the adhesive fracture energy, G(c) [J].
Bell, AJ ;
Kinloch, AJ .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE LETTERS, 1997, 16 (17) :1450-1453
[6]  
Chai H, 1986, ASTM STP, V893, P209
[7]  
COTTERELL B, 1977, INT J FRACTURE, V13, P267
[8]  
CREWS JH, 1988, ASTM STP, V981, P119
[9]   Mode-I fracture behaviour of adhesive joints .1. Relationship between fracture energy and bond thickness [J].
Daghyani, HR ;
Ye, L ;
Mai, YW .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1995, 53 (3-4) :149-162
[10]   Mode-I fracture behaviour of adhesive joints .2. Stress analysis and constraint parameters [J].
Daghyani, HR ;
Ye, L ;
Mai, YW .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1995, 53 (3-4) :163-172