The Money Blind: How to Stop Industry Bias in Biomedical Science, Without Violating the First Amendment

被引:9
作者
Robertson, Christopher T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Rogers Coll Law, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; FINANCIAL TIES; DISCLOSURE; SPEECH; FDA; INVESTIGATORS; MANAGEMENT; AUTHORSHIP;
D O I
10.1177/009885881103700207
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The pharmaceutical and medical device industries use billions of dollars to support the biomedical science that physicians, regulators, and patients use to make healthcare decisions-the decisions that drive an increasingly large portion of the American economy. Compelling evidence suggests that this industry money buys favorable results, biasing the outcomes of scientific research. Current efforts to manage the problem, including disclosure mandates and peer reviews, are ineffective. A blinding mechanism, operating through an intermediary such as the National Institutes of Health, could instead be developed to allow industry support of science without allowing undue influence. If the editors of biomedical journals fail to mandate that industry funders utilize such a solution, the federal government has several regulatory levers available, including conditioning federal funding and direct regulation, both of which could be done without violating the First Amendment.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 387
页数:30
相关论文
共 117 条
[41]   The cost of pushing pills: A new estimate of pharmaceutical promotion expenditures in the United States [J].
Gagnon, Marc-Andre ;
Lexchin, Joel .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (01) :29-33
[42]   Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: A systematic review [J].
Glaser, BE ;
Bero, LA .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2005, 11 (04) :553-573
[43]   A fine is a price [J].
Gneezy, U ;
Rustichini, A .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (01) :1-17
[44]   Is there evidence for biased reporting of published adverse effects data in pharmaceutical industry-funded studies? [J].
Golder, Su ;
Loke, Yoon K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 66 (06) :767-773
[45]  
HADFIELD G, 1998, J CONSUMER POLY, V21, P144
[46]  
Hadfield GillianK., 1998, J Cons Pol, V21, P131, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1006863016924
[48]   Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts [J].
Hopewell, Sally ;
Eisinga, Anne ;
Clarke, Mike .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (02) :162-173
[49]  
Horton R, 2004, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V51, P9
[50]  
*I MED BOARD HLTH, 2009, CONFL INT MED RES ED, V104