Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts

被引:46
作者
Cohen, BI
Pagnillo, MK
Condos, S
Deutsch, AS
机构
[1] Essential Dental Systems, South Hackensack, NJ
[2] School of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY
[3] Essential Dental Systems, S. Hackensack, NJ 07606
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90006-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the fractural load of four core materials supported by five post designs. This study was divided into 20 groups with 10 samples per group. Specimens were placed in a special jig at a 45-degree angle, and the fracture load values, in pounds, were obtained with the use of a universal testing machine. A 5 x 4 factorial design was used to assess and compare the fractural strength, and a two-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether the buccolingual, mesiodistal, and height dimensions differed across groupings. Mean fracture load values were obtained. Flexi-Post dowel/Ti-Core material at 277.1 pounds and ParaPost dowel/Tytin silver amalgam at 277.3 pounds recorded the greatest mean values. These values were not statistically different. ParaPost dowel/Ketac-Silver material had the lowest mean value (49.6 pounds). For all posts Tytin silver amalgam and Ti-Core material were significantly stronger than Ketac-Silver and G-C Miracle Mix material. Ketac-Silver and G-C Miracle Mix materials did not differ from each other. Results indicated that Ti-Core composite material is at least as strong as Tytin silver amalgam.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 495
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AKELINDE L, 1983, SWED DENT J, V7, P305
[2]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE BOND STRENGTHS OF AMALGAM AND ALLOY GLASS IONOMER CORES [J].
ARCORIA, CJ ;
DEWALD, JP ;
MOODY, CR ;
FERRACANE, JL .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1989, 16 (03) :301-307
[3]  
BROWN JD, 1987, OPER DENT, V12, P15
[4]  
Cohen B I, 1994, J Prosthodont, V3, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00126.x
[5]  
Cohen B I, 1994, Compendium, V15, P1128
[6]  
Cohen B I, 1995, J Esthet Dent, V7, P174, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1995.tb00574.x
[7]  
Cohen B I, 1995, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V16, P630
[8]  
Cohen B I, 1994, Int J Prosthodont, V7, P178
[9]  
Cohen B I, 1992, J Esthet Dent, V4 Suppl, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00720.x
[10]   COMPARISON OF RETENTIVE PROPERTIES OF 4 POST SYSTEMS [J].
COHEN, BI ;
MUSIKANT, BL ;
DEUTSCH, AS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (02) :264-268