Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts

被引:46
作者
Cohen, BI
Pagnillo, MK
Condos, S
Deutsch, AS
机构
[1] Essential Dental Systems, South Hackensack, NJ
[2] School of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY
[3] Essential Dental Systems, S. Hackensack, NJ 07606
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90006-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the fractural load of four core materials supported by five post designs. This study was divided into 20 groups with 10 samples per group. Specimens were placed in a special jig at a 45-degree angle, and the fracture load values, in pounds, were obtained with the use of a universal testing machine. A 5 x 4 factorial design was used to assess and compare the fractural strength, and a two-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether the buccolingual, mesiodistal, and height dimensions differed across groupings. Mean fracture load values were obtained. Flexi-Post dowel/Ti-Core material at 277.1 pounds and ParaPost dowel/Tytin silver amalgam at 277.3 pounds recorded the greatest mean values. These values were not statistically different. ParaPost dowel/Ketac-Silver material had the lowest mean value (49.6 pounds). For all posts Tytin silver amalgam and Ti-Core material were significantly stronger than Ketac-Silver and G-C Miracle Mix material. Ketac-Silver and G-C Miracle Mix materials did not differ from each other. Results indicated that Ti-Core composite material is at least as strong as Tytin silver amalgam.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 495
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 3 POST AND CORE TECHNIQUES [J].
HOAG, EP ;
DWYER, TG .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 47 (02) :177-181
[22]   EVALUATION AND RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH [J].
JOHNSON, JK ;
SCHWARTZ, NL ;
BLACKWELL, RT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 93 (03) :597-605
[23]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR PULPLESS TEETH [J].
KANTOR, ME ;
PINES, MS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1977, 38 (04) :405-412
[24]  
KOVARIK RE, 1995, AM J DENT, V8, P145
[25]   FATIGUE LIFE OF 3 CORE MATERIALS UNDER SIMULATED CHEWING CONDITIONS [J].
KOVARIK, RE ;
BREEDING, LC ;
CAUGHMAN, WF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (04) :584-590
[26]   TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF A GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT [J].
LACEFIELD, WR ;
REINDL, MC ;
RETIEF, DH .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1985, 53 (02) :194-198
[27]   COMPOSITE RESIN POST AND CORE [J].
LANDWERLEN, JR ;
BERRY, HH .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1972, 28 (05) :500-+
[28]  
LATTNER MJ, 1992, J DENT RES, V71, P1572
[29]  
LINDE LA, 1983, SWED DENT J, V7, P205
[30]  
Loney R W, 1995, Int J Prosthodont, V8, P247