Scaffolding 6th graders' problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: a qualitative case study

被引:46
作者
Kim, Minchi C. [1 ]
Hannafin, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Learning & Performance Support Lab, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Scaffolding; Scaffold; Problem solving; Technology-enhanced learning environments; Scientific inquiry; Classroom-based research; INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; DESIGN FRAMEWORK; SCHOOL; KNOWLEDGE; PROJECT; ONLINE; ARGUMENTATION; ENVIRONMENTS; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-010-9127-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In response to the calls to improve and deepen scientific understanding and literacy, considerable effort has been invested in developing sustainable technology-enhanced learning environments to improve science inquiry. Research has provided important guidance for scaffolding learning in mathematics and science. However, these reports have provided relatively little insight into how the different types of scaffolds can (or should) be implemented in dynamic, everyday classroom settings. In this qualitative case study, we examined how students solve scientific problems in technology-enhanced classrooms and how peer-, teacher-, and technology-enhanced scaffolds influenced student inquiry. The results indicated that students manifested distinct inquiry patterns when solving scientific problems and integrated different types of scaffolds to facilitate inquiry activities. These findings suggest that to support scientific inquiry in problem-solving contexts, technology-enhanced scaffolds are effective when supported by clear project goals, relevant evidence, peer- and teacher-assessments, and exemplars of knowledge articulation.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 282
页数:28
相关论文
共 82 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], SCAFFOLDING IN PRESS
[12]  
Applebee A., 1983, LANG ARTS, V60, P168
[13]  
Barab SA, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P719, DOI 10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<719::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-V
[15]  
BARRON L, 1992, ETR&D-EDUC TECH RES, V40, P65, DOI 10.1007/BF02296707
[16]   Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE [J].
Bell, P ;
Linn, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 22 (08) :797-817
[17]   Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking [J].
Chin, Christine .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2007, 44 (06) :815-843
[18]   Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks [J].
Chinn, CA ;
Malhotra, BA .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2002, 86 (02) :175-218
[19]   Designing for knowledge integration: The impact of instructional time [J].
Clark, D ;
Linn, MC .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (04) :451-493
[20]   Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality [J].
Clark, Douglas B. ;
Sampson, Victor .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2008, 45 (03) :293-321