Processing of Unjust and Just Information: Interpretation and Memory Performance Related to Dispositional Victim Sensitivity

被引:15
作者
Baumert, Anna [1 ]
Otto, Kathleen [2 ]
Thomas, Nadine [1 ]
Bobocel, D. Ramona [3 ]
Schmitt, Andmanfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Dept Psychol, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Dept Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
personality-congruent information processing; social justice; victim sensitivity; interpretation; memory; Sensitivity to Mean Intentions; processing bias; antisocial behaviour; JUSTICE SENSITIVITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INTERPRETATION BIAS; TEST ANXIETY; INJUSTICE; PERSONALITY; WORKPLACE;
D O I
10.1002/per.1844
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
With two studies, we tested whether dispositional victim sensitivity involves one of two kinds of biased processing style: either a processing style in which unjustbut not justinformation is processed more readily and accurately than neutral information or a processing style in which unjust and just information is processed preferentially over neutral information. In Study 1, victim sensitivity increased the speed with which participants resolved ambiguous sentence fragments in cases in which the resolution yielded an unjust connotation, as well as in cases in which the resolution yielded a just connotation, but not when the resolution was neutral with respect to justice. In Study 2, persons high in victim sensitivity displayed enhanced memory performance for both unjust and just information relative to neutral information over a 1-week retention interval. The results are consistent with the assumption that victim sensitivity is characterized by the activation potential and elaboration of both injustice and justice concepts. Our findings are important for the understanding of how the fear of being exploited among victim-sensitive persons shapes antisocial behaviour. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 110
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice [J].
Ambrose, ML ;
Seabright, MA ;
Schminke, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 89 (01) :947-965
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL IT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Detection theory: A user's guide
[4]   Justice Sensitivity and the Processing of Justice-related Information [J].
Baumert, Anna ;
Gollwitzer, Mario ;
Staubach, Miriam ;
Schmitt, Manfred .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2011, 25 (05) :386-397
[5]   Justice-sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations [J].
Baumert, Anna ;
Schmitt, Manfred .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 61 (01) :6-12
[6]   Justice sensitivity and source memory for cheaters [J].
Bell, Raoul ;
Buchner, Axel .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2010, 44 (06) :677-683
[7]   AFFECT AND MEMORY - A REVIEW [J].
BLANEY, PH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 99 (02) :229-246
[8]   EGO-THREAT INTERPRETIVE BIAS IN TEST ANXIETY - ONLINE INFERENCES [J].
CALVO, MG ;
EYSENCK, MW ;
ESTEVEZ, A .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1994, 8 (02) :127-146
[9]   Interpretation bias in test anxiety: The time course of predictive inferences [J].
Calvo, MG ;
Eysenck, MW ;
Castillo, MD .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1997, 11 (01) :43-63
[10]   Significant Predictors of Soccer Players' Moral Functioning from Components of Contextual Injustice, Sensitivity to Injustice and Moral Atmosphere [J].
Faccenda, Lionel ;
Pantaleon, Nathalie ;
Reynes, Eric .
SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2009, 22 (04) :399-415