Tailoring FSH and LH administration to individual patients

被引:14
作者
Borini, A [1 ]
Dal Prato, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Tecnobios Procreaz, Ctr Reprod Hlth, I-40125 Bologna, Italy
关键词
body mass index; FSH; individual dose; LH; ovarian response; ovarian stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60835-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Many clinical trials have been carried out to find the optimal gonadotrophin starting dose for IVF. The consensus for patients undergoing first treatment and < 40 years old is a range stretching from 150 to 250 IU/day. The varying ovarian response to gonadotrophins may be due to factors such as age, basal FSH, number of antral follicles and body mass index, all of which should be taken into account before choosing the type of protocol and the amount of gonadotrophins to use. Increasing the dose of recombinant FSH does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes. Higher doses of gonadotrophins are required in overweight patients, but enhanced protocols are thought to only marginally improve live birth rates in obese women. The actual role of LH in controlled ovarian stimulation is still a matter of debate. A therapeutic 'window' of LH concentrations, below which oestradiol production is inadequate and above which LH may be detrimental to follicular development has been described.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 293
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]   Ovulation induction with urinary FSH or recombinant FSH in polycystic ovary syndrome patients: a prospective randomized analysis of cost-effectiveness [J].
Gerli, S ;
Casini, ML ;
Unfer, V ;
Costabile, L ;
Mignosa, M ;
Di Renzo, GC .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 9 (05) :494-499
[32]   A prospective randomized clinical trial of differing starter doses of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin-β) for first time in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles [J].
Harrison, RF ;
Jacob, S ;
Spillane, H ;
Mallon, E ;
Hennelly, B .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (01) :23-31
[33]   Serum antimullerian hormone/mullerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol [J].
Hazout, A ;
Bouchard, P ;
Seifer, DB ;
Aussage, P ;
Junca, AM ;
Cohen-Bacrie, P .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (05) :1323-1329
[34]   Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal folliclestimulating hormone level [J].
Hendriks, DJ ;
Mol, BWJ ;
Bancsi, LFJMM ;
te Velde, ER ;
Broekmans, FJM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (02) :291-301
[35]  
Hugues Jean-Noel, 2003, Reprod Biomed Online, V6, P185
[36]   Effects of recombinant LH supplementation in women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and stimulation with recombinant FSH: an opening study [J].
Humaidan, P ;
Bungum, M ;
Bungum, L ;
Andersen, CY .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (06) :635-643
[37]   Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome related to mid-follicular LH levels in women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH stimulation [J].
Humaidan, P ;
Bungum, L ;
Bungum, M ;
Andersen, CY .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (08) :2016-2021
[38]   Dose-finding study of triptorelin acetate for prevention of a premature LH surge in IVF: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Janssens, RMJ ;
Lambalk, CB ;
Vermeiden, JPW ;
Schats, R ;
Bernards, JM ;
Rekers-Mombarg, LTM ;
Schoemaker, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (11) :2333-2340
[39]   Cryopreservation: The practicalities of evaluation [J].
Jones, HW ;
Out, HJ ;
Hoomans, EHM ;
Driessen, SGAJ ;
Bennink, HJTC .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) :1522-1524
[40]   Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Klinkert, ER ;
Broekmans, FJM ;
Looman, CWN ;
Habbema, JDF ;
te Velde, ER .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) :611-615