Knowledge integration: Conceptualizing communications in cancer control systems

被引:64
作者
Best, Allan [1 ]
Hiatt, Robert A. [2 ]
Norman, Cameron D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Evaluat, Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L8, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prevention; behavioral prevention research; dissemination; implementation; translational research; cancer control;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This paper was prepared by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Working Group on Translational Research and Knowledge Transfer. The goal was to nurture common ground upon which to build a platform for translating what we know about cancer into what we do in practice and policy. Methods: Methods included expert panels, literature review, and concept mapping, to develop a framework that built on earlier cancer control conceptualizations Of Communications that have guided researchers and end users. Results: The concept of 'knowledge integration' is used to describe the resulting refinement and the nature of evidence necessary for decision-making to at the systems level. Current evidence for knowledge integration in cancer control is presented across the levels of individual, organizational and systems level interventions and across basic, clinical and population science knowledge bases. Conclusion: A systems-oriented approach to integrating evidence into action assists organizations to conduct research and policy and practice. Practice implications: Practitioners can use this framework to understand the challenges of implementing and evaluating cancer control strategies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   Moving discovery into clinical practice [J].
Mendelsohn, J .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (24) :8129-8129
[52]   The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials [J].
Moher, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Altman, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (15) :1987-1991
[53]  
NCI (Natl. Cancer Inst.), 2002, DES DISS C SUMM REP
[54]  
*NCIC WORK GROUP T, 2006, TRANSL RES BARR OPP
[55]   Caring for the community: The role of partnerships [J].
Omenn, GS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (07) :782-789
[56]   Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research [J].
Pasick, RJ ;
Hiatt, RA ;
Paskett, ED .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (05) :1146-1164
[57]   Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers [J].
Pober, JS ;
Neuhauser, CS ;
Pober, JM .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2001, 15 (13) :2303-2313
[58]   THE POTENTIAL OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINING AND EXTENDING LINKAGES BETWEEN THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL-SCIENCES [J].
ROSENFIELD, PL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1992, 35 (11) :1343-1357
[59]   Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions [J].
Rychetnik, L ;
Frommer, M ;
Hawe, P ;
Shiell, A .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2002, 56 (02) :119-127
[60]   Advocating evidence-based health promotion: reflections and a way forward [J].
Rychetnik, L ;
Wise, M .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 19 (02) :247-257