Comparison of methods for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from food products

被引:16
作者
Corrente, M. [1 ]
Normanno, G. [1 ]
Martella, V. [1 ]
Bellacicco, A. L. [1 ]
Quaglia, N. C. [1 ]
Dambrosio, A. [1 ]
Buonavoglia, D. [1 ]
D'Abramo, M. [1 ]
Buonavoglia, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Fac Vet Med, Dept Hlth & Anim Well Being, I-70010 Bari, Italy
关键词
food products; methicillin resistance; Staphylococcus aureus;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02226.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: To compare several methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from food. Methods and Results: Two hundred S. aureus isolates from food of animal origin were screened for methicillin resistance by a PCR assay specific for the mecA gene, an oxacillin agar screen test and a cefoxitin disk diffusion test. Six out of 200 strains (3%) were found to be methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by PCR. The oxacillin agar screen test detected only one of the MRSA isolates (sensitivity of 16 center dot 7%) and mischaracterized three additional strains as MRSA (specificity of 98 center dot 45%). None of the MRSA strains was detected by the cefoxitin test (sensitivity of 0%), while 15 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains were misclassified as resistant (specificity of 92 center dot 3%). Fifteen MSSA strains displayed a beta-lactamase hyperproducer-like phenotype. The six MRSA (mecA-positive) strains resembled the characteristics of heteroresistant strains. Conclusions: As MRSA of animal origin may display atypical phenotypes, PCR appears to be more reliable for detection of methicillin resistance in animal strains. Significance and Impact of the Study: The study stresses the need for implementing the methods of screening S. aureus from food of animal origin for methicillin resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 539
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO
[2]   Discrepancies between mecA PCR and conventional tests used for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Araj, GF ;
Talhouk, RS ;
Simaan, CJ ;
Maasad, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (01) :47-52
[3]   Methicillin-resistant staphylococci in companion animals [J].
Baptiste, KE ;
Williams, K ;
Willams, NJ ;
Wattret, A ;
Clegg, PD ;
Dawson, S ;
Corkill, JE ;
O'Neill, T ;
Hart, CA .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 11 (12) :1942-1944
[4]   Comparison of tests to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus intermedius, Staphylococcus schleifefi, and Staphylococcus aureus isolates from canine hosts [J].
Bemis, David A. ;
Jones, Rebekah D. ;
Hiatt, Lauren E. ;
Ofori, Edward D. ;
Rohrbach, Barton W. ;
Frank, Linda A. ;
Kania, Stephen A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (09) :3374-3376
[5]   Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Boubaker, IBB ;
Ben Abbes, R ;
Ben Abdallah, H ;
Mamlouk, K ;
Mahjoubi, F ;
Kammoun, A ;
Hammami, A ;
Ben Redjeb, S .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (08) :762-765
[6]   Detection of methicillin/oxacillin resistance in staphylococci [J].
Brown, DFJ .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 :65-70
[7]   The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? [J].
Chambers, HF .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (02) :178-182
[8]  
CHAMBERS HF, 1993, INFECT DIS CLIN N AM, V7, P425
[9]   Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications [J].
Chambers, HF .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 10 (04) :781-+
[10]   INFLUENCE OF BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITORS ON THE ACTIVITY OF OXACILLIN AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS [J].
CHANG, SC ;
HSIEH, WC ;
LUH, KT .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1995, 21 (02) :81-84