The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review

被引:69
作者
Salisbury, C
Bosanquet, N
Wilkinson, EK
Franks, PJ
Kite, S
Lorentzon, M
Naysmith, A
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Div Primary Hlth Care, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] St Marys Hosp, Imperial Coll, Sch Med, Dept Primary Hlth Care, London, England
[3] Thames Valley Univ, Ctr Res & Implementat Clin Practice, London, England
[4] St Bartholomews Hosp, Palliat Care Team, London, England
[5] St Charles Hosp, Pembridge Palliat Care Ctr, London W10 6DZ, England
关键词
palliative care; quality of life; review literature;
D O I
10.1191/026921699677461429
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study set out to systematically review the research evidence about the impact of alternative models of specialist palliative ca re on the quality of life of patients. Eighty-six relevant papers were identified and reviewed, including 22 descriptive and 27 comparative studies. We found few comparative trials of reasonable quality. There was some evidence that in-patient palliative care provided better pain control than home care or conventional hospital care, but this research was dated and open to criticism. Research on palliative home care teams and co-ordinating nurses has demonstrated limited impact on quality of life over conventional care for patients dying at home. These negative findings may be due to the limitations of the assessment tools used. There is a need for larger studies to provide clear evidence as to whether specialist palliative care services provide improvements in patients' quality of life. This review does not exclude the possibility that models of care might he justifiable on other grounds such as patient preference or cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 17
页数:15
相关论文
共 100 条
[72]  
Parkes C M, 1978, J R Coll Gen Pract, V28, P19
[73]   HOSPICE VERSUS HOSPITAL-CARE - RE-EVALUATION AFTER 10 YEARS AS SEEN BY SURVIVING SPOUSES [J].
PARKES, CM ;
PARKES, J .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 60 (700) :120-124
[75]   TERMINAL CARE - EVALUATION OF IN-PATIENT SERVICE AT ST-CHRISTOPHERS-HOSPICE .1. VIEWS OF SURVIVING SPOUSE ON EFFECTS OF THE SERVICE ON THE PATIENT [J].
PARKES, CM .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 55 (646) :517-522
[76]   Outcome evaluation in a home palliative care service [J].
Peruselli, C ;
Paci, E ;
Franceschi, P ;
Legori, T ;
Mannucci, F .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (03) :158-165
[77]   The use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) within a palliative care unit in the UK [J].
Rees, E ;
Hardy, J ;
Ling, J ;
Broadley, K ;
A'Hern, R .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 12 (02) :75-82
[78]   Quality of life: The main outcome measure of palliative care [J].
Richards, MA ;
Ramirez, AJ .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 11 (02) :89-92
[79]   Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: A systematic review [J].
Rinck, GC ;
vandenBos, GAM ;
Kleijnen, J ;
deHaes, HJCJM ;
Schade, E ;
Veenhof, CHN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (04) :1697-1707
[80]   A COMPARISON OF HOSPICE AND CONVENTIONAL CARE [J].
SEALE, C .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1991, 32 (02) :147-152