Endovenous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

被引:25
作者
Dletzek, Alan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Danbury Hosp, Med Arts Ctr, Linda & Stephen R Cohen Chair Vasc Surg, Danbury, CT 06810 USA
关键词
ablation; Closure; endovenous; radiofrequency; saphenous; varicose vein;
D O I
10.2310/6670.2007.00062
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is the most common vascular disease and represents a significant health care problem in the United States. Reflux of the great saphenous vein is the most common cause of this condition, whose symptoms include varicose veins, leg swelling, skin discoloration, and ulceration. The traditional treatment of this condition is saphenofemoral ligation with stripping of the saphenous vein followed by varicose vein removal, if necessary. Recent advances in minimally invasive endovenous therapy have led to the development of catheter-based radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the saphenous vein, which has gained an increasing acceptance in clinical practice. Endovenous RFA was introduced into clinical practice in Europe in 1998 and in the United States in 1999. Since then, over 250,000 procedures have been performed worldwide. Procedure safety and efficacy are well understood, with over 60 publications on the subject in the peer review literature, including four randomized trials comparing this technology with traditional vein stripping surgery. With the advent of tumescent anesthesia, the majority of RFA procedures are now performed in an office setting. This article examines the current technology using RFA in saphenous vein ablation with the Closure catheter system. Procedural techniques and clinical outcome using RFA in saphenous vein ablation are discussed. Clinical data comparing RFA versus saphenous vein stripping are also examined. Lastly, the clinical utility of a new RFA catheter, ClosureFAST, is discussed. ClosureFAST is a new generation of RFA catheter and has exhibited significant improvement in the ease of use and the procedure speed over the previous generation catheters while maintaining the favorable patient recovery profile seen with the RFA technology.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 261
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Duplex ultrasound scan findings two years after great saphenous vein radiofrequency endovenous obliteration [J].
Pichot, O ;
Kabnick, LS ;
Creton, D ;
Merchant, RF ;
Schuller-Petroviæ, S ;
Chandler, JG .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (01) :189-195
[22]  
Pichot O, 2000, J ENDOVASC THER, V7, P451, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2000)007<0451:RODIIE>2.0.CO
[23]  
2
[24]  
PROEBSTLE TM, 2007, 19 AM VEN FOR ANN M
[25]   Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins:: A randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs [J].
Rautio, T ;
Ohinmaa, A ;
Perälä, J ;
Ohtonen, P ;
Heikkinen, T ;
Wiik, H ;
Karjalainen, P ;
Haukipuro, K ;
Juvonen, T .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :958-965
[26]   Endovenous obliteration with radiofrequency-resistive heating for greater saphenous vein insufficiency:: A feasibility study [J].
Rautio, TT ;
Perälä, JM ;
Wiik, HT ;
Juvonen, TS ;
Haukipuro, KA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (06) :569-575
[27]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF STRIPPING VERSUS HIGH LIGATION COMBINED WITH SCLEROTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF THE INCOMPETENT GREATER SAPHENOUS-VEIN [J].
RUTGERS, PH ;
KITSLAAR, PJEHM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 168 (04) :311-315
[28]   Comparative outcomes of radiofrequency endoluminal ablation, invagination stripping, and cryostripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency [J].
Stötter, L ;
Schaaf, I ;
Bockelbrink, A .
PHLEBOLOGY, 2006, 21 (02) :60-64
[29]   Initial experiences in endovenous treatment of saphenous vein reflux [J].
Sybrandy, JEM ;
Wittens, CHA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (06) :1207-1212
[30]   Recurrence after varicose vein surgery: A prospective long-term clinical study with duplex ultrasound scanning and air plethysmography [J].
van Rij, AM ;
Jiang, P ;
Solomon, C ;
Christie, RA ;
Hill, GB .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (05) :935-943