Aortic Annulus Diameter Determination by Multidetector Computed Tomography Reproducibility, Applicability, and Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

被引:153
作者
Gurvitch, Ronen [1 ]
Webb, John G. [1 ]
Yuan, Ren [1 ]
Johnson, Mark [1 ]
Hague, Cameron [1 ]
Willson, Alexander B. [1 ]
Toggweiler, Stefan [1 ]
Wood, David A. [1 ]
Ye, Jian [1 ]
Moss, Robert [1 ]
Thompson, Christopher R. [1 ]
Achenbach, Stephan [2 ]
Min, James K. [3 ,4 ]
LaBounty, Troy M. [3 ,4 ]
Cury, Ricardo [5 ]
Leipsic, Jonathon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Imaging Biomed Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] Baptist Hosp Miami, Miami, FL USA
关键词
aortic annulus; aortic stenosis; computed tomography; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; REPLACEMENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ROOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study sought to determine the most reproducible multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measurements of the aortic annulus and to determine methods to improve the applicability of these measurements for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Background The reproducibility and applicability of MDCT annular measurements to guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation remain unclear. Methods Annular measurements were performed in 50 patients planed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in multiple planes: basal ring (short- and long-axis, mean diameter, area-derived diameter), corona!, sagittal, and 3-chamber projections. A theoretical model was developed taking into account the differences between the most reproducible MDCT measurements and transesophageal echocardiography to guide valve size choice. Results The most reproducible measurements were the area-derived diameter and basal ring average diameter (inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.87 [95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 0.92] and 0.80 [95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.871; respectively; intrareader > 0.90 for all readers). These were generally larger than transesophageal echocardiography diameters (mean difference of 1.5 +/- 1.6 mm and 1.1 +/- 1.7 mm, respectively). When a strategy of valve-sizing is undertaken using these CT measurements using an echocardiographic sizing scale, a different THV size would be selected in 44% and 40% of cases, respectively. When adjusting the sizing cutoffs to account for the differences in observed diameters, this was reduced to 10% to 12% (p < 0.01 for both, respectively). Conclusions The most reproducible MDCT measurements of the annulus are the area-derived diameter and basal ring average diameter, with derived values generally larger than those obtained with echocardiography. If MIXT is used for valve sizing, a strategy incorporating these differences may be important. MDCT using these easily derived measurements may be ideally suited to sizing transcatheter aortic valves as they account for the eccentricity of the aortic annulus, are reproducible, and are noninvasive. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011; 4:1235-45) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1245
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Can Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Help Determine Appropriate Transcatheter Aortic Valve Size? [J].
Babaliaros, Vasilis C. ;
Liff, David ;
Chen, Edward P. ;
Rogers, Jason H. ;
Brown, Ryan A. ;
Thourani, Vinod H. ;
Guyton, Robert A. ;
Lerakis, Stamatios ;
Stillman, Arthur E. ;
Raggi, Paolo ;
Cheesborough, Jennifer E. ;
Veladar, Emir ;
Green, Jacob T. ;
Block, Peter C. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 1 (05) :580-586
[2]   Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Stenosis: EAE/ASE Recommendations for Clinical Practice [J].
Baumgartner, Helmut ;
Hung, Judy ;
Bermejo, Javier ;
Chambers, John B. ;
Evangelista, Arturo ;
Griffin, Brian P. ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Otto, Catherine M. ;
Pellikka, Patricia A. ;
Quinones, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 22 (01) :1-23
[3]   Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System [J].
Grube, Eberhard ;
Buellesfeld, Lutz ;
Mueller, Ralf ;
Sauren, Barthel ;
Zickmann, Bernfried ;
Nair, Dinesh ;
Beucher, Harald ;
Felderhoff, Thomas ;
Iversen, Stein ;
Gerckens, Ulrich .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 1 (03) :167-175
[4]   Multislice Computed Tomography for Prediction of Optimal Angiographic Deployment Projections During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [J].
Gurvitch, Ronen ;
Wood, David A. ;
Leipsic, Jonathon ;
Tay, Edgar ;
Johnson, Mark ;
Ye, Jian ;
Nietlispach, Fabian ;
Wijesinghe, Namal ;
Cheung, Anson ;
Webb, John G. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (11) :1157-1165
[5]  
HANKINSON SE, 1995, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V4, P649
[6]   Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Aortic Stenosis: The Role of Echocardiography [J].
Jayasuriya, Cleonie ;
Moss, Robert Rex ;
Munt, Brad .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (01) :15-27
[7]   Multimodal Assessment of the Aortic Annulus Diameter Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [J].
Messika-Zeitoun, David ;
Serfaty, Jean-Michel ;
Brochet, Eric ;
Ducrocq, Gregory ;
Lepage, Laurent ;
Detaint, Delphine ;
Hyafil, Fabien ;
Himbert, Dominique ;
Pasi, Nicoletta ;
Laissy, Jean-Pierre ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Vahanian, Alec .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (03) :186-194
[8]   Role of Echocardiography in Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation [J].
Moss, Robert R. ;
Ivens, Emma ;
Pasupati, Sanjeevan ;
Humphries, Karin ;
Thompson, Christopher R. ;
Munt, Brad ;
Sinhal, Ajay ;
Webb, John G. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2008, 1 (01) :15-24
[9]   Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve [J].
Piazza, Nicolo ;
de Jaegere, Peter ;
Schultz, Carl ;
Becker, Anton E. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. ;
Anderson, Robert H. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 1 (01) :74-81
[10]  
Schultz C, 2010, EUROINTERVENTION, V6, P505, DOI 10.4244/EIJ30V6I4A84