Multisensor approach to automated classification of sea ice image data

被引:60
作者
Bogdanov, AV
Sandven, S
Johannessen, OM
Alexandrov, VY
Bobylev, LP
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Neuroinformat, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
[2] Nansen Int Environm & Remote Sensing Ctr, St Petersburg, Russia
[3] Nansen Environm & Remote Sensing Ctr, N-5006 Bergen, Norway
[4] Nansen Int Environm & Remote Sensing Ctr, St Petersburg 197101, Russia
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2005年 / 43卷 / 07期
关键词
data fusion; European Remote Sensing (ERS); neural network; RADARSAT; satellite remote sensing; sea ice classification; synthetic aperture radar (SAR);
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2005.846882
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A multisensor data fusion algorithm based on a multilayer neural network is presented for sea ice classification in the winter period. The algorithm uses European Remote Sensing (ERS), RADARSAT synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and low-resolution television camera images and image texture features. Based on a set of in situ observations made at the Kara Sea, a neural network is trained, and its structure is optimized using a pruning method. The performance of the algorithm with different combinations of input features (sensors) is assessed and compared with the performance of a linear discriminant analysis (LDA)-based algorithm. We show that for both algorithms a substantial improvement can be gained by fusion of the three different types of data (91.2% for the neural network) as compared with single-source ERS (66.0%) and RADARSAT (70.7%) SAR image classification. Incorporation of texture increases classification accuracy. This positive effect of texture becomes weaker with increasing number of sensors (from 8.4 to 6.4 percent points for the use of two and three sensors, respectively). In view of the short training time and smaller number of adjustable parameters, this result suggests that semiparametric classification methods can be considered as a good alternative to the neural networks and traditional parametric statistical classifiers applied for the sea ice classification.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1664
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[21]   TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION [J].
HARALICK, RM ;
SHANMUGAM, K ;
DINSTEIN, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06) :610-621
[22]   A COMPREHENSIVE, AUTOMATED APPROACH TO DETERMINING SEA-ICE THICKNESS FROM SAR DATA [J].
HAVERKAMP, D ;
SOH, LK ;
TSATSOULIS, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 33 (01) :46-57
[23]   Information fusion for estimation of summer MIZ ice concentration from SAR imagery [J].
Haverkamp, D ;
Tsatsoulis, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (03) :1278-1291
[24]   TEXTURAL ANALYSIS AND REAL-TIME CLASSIFICATION OF SEA ICE TYPES USING DIGITAL SAR DATA [J].
HOLMES, QA ;
NUESCH, DR ;
SHUCHMAN, RA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1984, 22 (02) :113-120
[25]  
JOHANNESSEN OM, 2002, 227 NERSC
[26]  
JOHANNESSEN OM, 1992, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V68, P261
[27]   Baltic Sea Ice SAR segmentation and classification using modified pulse-coupled neural networks [J].
Karvonen, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (07) :1566-1574
[28]  
KEY J, 1989, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V55, P1331
[29]  
KLOSTER K, 1997, REPORT BACKSCATTER N
[30]  
KLOSTER K, 1999, COMMUNICATION MAY