Is poverty multidimensional? A comparison of income and asset based measures in five Southern African countries

被引:35
作者
von Maltzahn, Robyn [1 ]
Durrheim, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Psychol, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
poverty; Southern Africa; measurement; units of analysis; dimensions;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-007-9105-7
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper contests the major emphasis placed on the multidimensional nature of poverty measurement. Instead, it argues that poverty pictures created by different measures and at different units of analysis tend to converge. This argument is derived from a comparison of poverty pictures created using income and asset-based measures at the national and household level in five South African Development Community countries. Although multidimensional measures have value in illuminating subtle differences, the findings indicate a single dimension of poverty that runs throughout all the measures and levels of analysis. However, despite the single poverty picture provided by different measures, the abandonment of these different measures is not supported. Multidimensional measures provide insight into particular elements of poverty that is useful and relevant to poverty interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 162
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] HAUPET P, 2006, SAARF UNIVERSAL LIVI
  • [12] HAUPET P, 2002, LSMS 12 YEARS CONTIN
  • [13] ICELAND J, 2003, POVERTY ESTIMATES AL
  • [14] KAKWANI N, 1984, ADV ECONOMETRICS, V3, P253
  • [15] Laderchi C., 1997, OXFORD DEV STUDIES, V25, P345, DOI DOI 10.1080/13600819708424139
  • [16] Mattes R. B., 2003, POVERTY SURVIVAL DEM
  • [17] Poverty comparisons over time and across countries in Africa
    Sahn, DE
    Stifel, DC
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (12) : 2123 - 2155
  • [18] SAHN DE, 1999, 94 CORN U
  • [19] POVERTY - ORDINAL APPROACH TO MEASUREMENT
    SEN, A
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1976, 44 (02) : 219 - 231
  • [20] SHIMELES A, 2005, POVERTY PROFILES MET