Side-to-side weight-bearing asymmetry in subjects with low back pain

被引:24
作者
Childs, JD
Piva, SR
Erhard, RE
Hicks, G
机构
[1] MMKPP, Phys Therapy Serv, Wilford Hall Med Ctr, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Med, Hlth Syst Spine Special Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Natl Inst Aging, Gerontol Res Ctr, Clin Res Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00014-6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The purpose of this project was to determine if subjects with low back pain (LBP) exhibit greater side-to-side weight-bearing (WB) asymmetry compared to healthy control subjects without LBP. This study utilized an observational double cohort design and consisted of 35 subjects with LBP and 31 healthy control subjects. Side-to-side WB asymmetry was calculated as the average of the absolute value of the difference between the right and left lower extremity from three trials. The percentage of the average side-to-side WB asymmetry relative to the total body weight was calculated to normalize expected differences in magnitude of asymmetry based on a subject's total body weight. An 11-point numeric pain rating scale was used to represent the subject's current level of pain. Patients with LBP demonstrated significantly greater normalized side-to-side WB asymmetry than healthy control subjects (8.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively, P<0.001). In patients with LBP, higher magnitudes of side-to-side WB asymmetry were significantly associated with increased pain (r = 0.39, P = 0.021). In conclusion patients with LBP exhibited increased side-to-side WB asymmetry compared to healthy control subjects without LBP. This asymmetry was associated with increased levels of pain. This finding is relevant for planning future studies that will attempt to provide evidence for the construct validity of manipulation by determining if side-to-side WB asymmetry normalizes after a manipulation intervention and if this improvement is associated with improvements in pain and function. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 169
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]  
*SPSS I, 1998, SPSS WIND 1 1
[22]   ASSESSING CHANGE OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
STRATFORD, PW ;
BINKLEY, J ;
SOLOMON, P ;
GILL, C ;
FINCH, E .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (06) :528-533
[23]   MANIPULATIVE THERAPY VERSUS EDUCATION-PROGRAMS IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
TRIANO, JJ ;
MCGREGOR, M ;
HONDRAS, MA ;
BRENNAN, PC .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (08) :948-955
[24]   Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint - A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis [J].
Tullberg, T ;
Blomberg, S ;
Branth, B ;
Johnsson, R .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (10) :1124-1128
[25]   PAIN DRAWINGS IN CHRONIC BACK PAIN [J].
UDEN, A ;
ASTROM, M ;
BERGENUDD, H .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (04) :389-392
[26]  
Wreje Ullacarin, 1992, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, V10, P310, DOI 10.3109/02813439209014080