Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask

被引：166

作者：

Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus ^{[1
]}

Lindquist, Martin A. ^{[2
]}

Nichols, Thomas E. ^{[3
,4
,5
]}

Poldrack, Russell A. ^{[6
]}

Vul, Edward ^{[7
,8
]}

机构：

[1] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge, England

[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Stat, New York, NY USA

[3] Univ Warwick, Dept Stat, Warwick, England

[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Clin Neurol, Oxford, England

[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

[6] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol & Neurobiol, Austin, TX 78712 USA

[7] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

[8] UCSD, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM | 2010年 / 30卷 / 09期

基金：

英国医学研究理事会;

关键词：

brain imaging; functional magnetic resonance imaging; imaging; neuroimaging; statistical methods; VUL ET-AL; PUZZLINGLY HIGH CORRELATIONS; SOCIAL COGNITION; FMRI; PERSONALITY; EMOTION; NEUROSCIENCE; ACTIVATION; VOODOO; BRAIN;

D O I：

10.1038/jcbfm.2010.86

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Over the past year, a heated discussion about 'circular' or 'nonindependent' analysis in brain imaging has emerged in the literature. An analysis is circular (or nonindependent) if it is based on data that were selected for showing the effect of interest or a related effect. The authors of this paper are researchers who have contributed to the discussion and span a range of viewpoints. To clarify points of agreement and disagreement in the community, we collaboratively assembled a series of questions on circularity herein, to which we provide our individual current answers in <= 100 words per question. Although divergent views remain on some of the questions, there is also a substantial convergence of opinion, which we have summarized in a consensus box. The box provides the best current answers that the five authors could agree upon. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2010) 30, 1551-1557; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.86; published online 23 June 2010

引用

页码：1551 / 1557

页数：7

共 21 条

[1] Understanding the Mind by Measuring the Brain: Lessons From Measuring Behavior (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009) [J].

Barrett, Lisa Feldman .

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (03) :314-318

[2] Editor's Introduction to Vul et al. (2009) and Comments [J].

Diener, Ed .

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (03) :272-273

[3]

Friston KJ., 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P210, DOI [DOI 10.1002/HBM.460010306, 10.1002/hbm.460010306]

[4] Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate [J].

Genovese, CR ;

Lazar, NA ;

Nichols, T .

NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 15 (04) :870-878

[5] Why most discovered true associations are inflated [J].

Ioannidis, John P. A. .

EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (05) :640-648

[6] Why most published research findings are false [J].

Ioannidis, JPA .

PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) :696-701

[7] Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping [J].

Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus ;

Simmons, W. Kyle ;

Bellgowan, Patrick S. F. ;

Baker, Chris I. .

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 12 (05) :535-540

[8] Discussion of "Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition" by Vul et al. (2009) [J].

Lazar, Nicole A. .

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (03) :308-309

[9] Correlations in Social Neuroscience Aren't Voodoo: Commentary on Vul et al. (2009) [J].

Lieberman, Matthew D. ;

Berkman, Elliot T. ;

Wager, Tor D. .

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (03) :299-307

[10]

LINDQUIST M, 2009, HUM BRAIN MAPP ANN M

← 1 2 3 →