Identifying Jumps in Financial Assets: A Comparison Between Nonparametric Jump Tests

被引:86
作者
Dumitru, Ana-Maria [1 ,2 ]
Urga, Giovanni [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Sch Econ, Fac Business Econ & Law, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Bergamo, Dept Econ & Technol Management, I-24044 Bergamo, Italy
[3] Cass Business Sch, Ctr Econometr Anal, Fac Finance, London, England
[4] Univ Bergamo, Hyman P Minsky Dept Econ Studies, I-24127 Bergamo, Italy
关键词
High-frequency data; Jumps; Monte Carlo simulations; Nonparametric tests; Stochastic volatility; VOLATILITY MODELS; DIFFUSION; NOISE;
D O I
10.1080/07350015.2012.663250
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We perform a comprehensive Monte Carlo comparison between nine alternative procedures available in the literature to detect jumps in financial assets using high-frequency data. We evaluate size and power properties of the procedures under alternative sampling frequencies, persistence in volatility, jump size and intensity, and degree of contamination with microstructure noise. The overall best performance is shown by the Andersen, Bollerslev, and Dobrev (2007) and Lee and Mykland (2008) intraday procedures (ABD-LM), provided the price process is not very volatile. We propose two extensions to the existing battery of tests. The first regards the finite sample improvements based on simulated critical values for the ABD-LM procedure. The second regards a procedure that combines frequencies and tests able to reduce the number of spurious jumps. Finally, we report an empirical analysis using real high frequency data on five stocks listed in the New York Stock Exchange.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 255
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Disentangling diffusion from jumps [J].
Aït-Sahalia, Y .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 74 (03) :487-528
[2]   TESTING FOR JUMPS IN A DISCRETELY OBSERVED PROCESS [J].
Ait-Sahalia, Yacine ;
Jacod, Jean .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2009, 37 (01) :184-222
[3]  
Andersen T.G., 2009, NBER WORKING PAPERS
[4]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[5]   No-arbitrage semi-martingale restrictions for continuous-time volatility models subject to leverage effects, jumps and i.i.d. noise: Theory and testable distributional implications [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Dobrev, Dobrislav .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 138 (01) :125-180
[6]   Limit theorems for multipower variation in the presence of jumps [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, OE ;
Shephard, N ;
Winkel, M .
STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2006, 116 (05) :796-806
[7]  
Barndorff-Nielsen OleE., 2006, Journal of financial Econometrics, V4, p1. 1, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBI022
[8]  
BarndorffNielsen O. E., 2004, Journal of Financial Econometrics, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBH001
[9]   Alternative models for stock price dynamics [J].
Chernov, M ;
Gallant, AR ;
Ghysels, E ;
Tauchen, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 116 (1-2) :225-257
[10]   Threshold bipower variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting [J].
Corsi, Fulvio ;
Pirino, Davide ;
Reno, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2010, 159 (02) :276-288