A Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Labels in the United States: 2006 to 2010

被引:85
作者
Gnanasakthy, Ari [1 ]
Mordin, Margaret [2 ]
Clark, Marci [2 ]
DeMuro, Carla [2 ]
Fehnel, Sheri [2 ]
Copley-Merriman, Catherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[2] RTI Hlth Solut, Durham, NC USA
关键词
drug labeling; patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PRODUCT LABELS; END-POINTS; GUIDANCE; APPROVAL; IMPACT; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: In 2004, Willke and colleagues reviewed the efficacy endpoints reported in the labels of new drugs approved in the United States from 1997 through 2002 to evaluate the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints. Of the labels reviewed, 30% included PROs. Our study aimed to build on this work by describing the current state of PRO label claims granted for new molecular entities (and biologic license applications since February 2006 after the release of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft PRO guidance. Methods: All new molecular entities and biologic license applications approved by the FDA from January 2006 through December 2010 were identified by using the Web page of the FDA Drug Approval Reports. For all identified products, drug approval packages and approved product labels were reviewed to identify PRO endpoint status and to determine the number and type of PRO claims. Results: Of the 116 products identified, 28 (24%) were granted PRO claims; 24 (86%) were for symptoms, and, of these, 9 (38%) claims were pain related. Of the 28 products with PRO claims, a PRO was a primary endpoint for 20 (71%), all symptom related. Conclusions: The FDA continues to approve PRO claims, with 24% of new molecular entities and biologic license applications being granted. Successful PRO label claims over the past 5 years have generally supported treatment benefit for symptoms specified as primary endpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 [J].
Acquadro, C ;
Berzon, R ;
Dubois, D ;
Leidy, NK ;
Marquis, P ;
Revicki, D ;
Rothman, M .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) :522-531
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-Reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[3]   Highlights and a hidden hazard - The FDA's new labeling regulations [J].
Avorn, J ;
Shrank, W .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (23) :2409-2411
[4]   The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval [J].
Burke, L. B. ;
Kennedy, D. L. ;
Miskala, P. H. ;
Papadopoulos, E. J. ;
Trentacosti, A. M. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (02) :281-283
[5]  
Caron M, 2008, PATIENT REPORTED OUT, V40, P8
[6]   Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels [J].
Gondek, Kathleen ;
Sagnier, Pierre-Philippe ;
Gilchrist, Kim ;
Woolley, J. Michael .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (32) :5087-5093
[7]  
Goozner M, 2010, PINK SHEET, V72
[8]   End points and United States food and drug administration approval of oncology drugs [J].
Johnson, JR ;
Williams, G ;
Pazdur, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (07) :1404-1411
[9]   Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters to Manufacturers of Pharmaceuticals and Therapeutic Biologicals for Promotional Violations [J].
Kamal, Khalid M. ;
Desselle, Shane P. ;
Rane, Pallavi ;
Parekh, Rachi ;
Zacker, Christopher .
DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2009, 43 (04) :385-393
[10]  
Marquis P, 2011, INT SOC PHARM OUTC R