How to model a complex trait

被引:17
作者
Strauch, K [1 ]
Fimmers, R [1 ]
Baur, MP [1 ]
Wienker, TF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Med Biometry Informat & Epidemiol, DE-53105 Bonn, Germany
关键词
linkage analysis; complex traits; parametric (model-based) analysis; LOD scores; nonparametric (model-free) analysis; NPL scores; genotype-phenotype relation; genetic models; MOD scores;
D O I
10.1159/000073204
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Usually, when complex traits are at issue, not only are the loci of the responsible genes a priori unknown; the same also holds for the mode of inheritance of the trait, and sometimes even for the phenotype definition. The term mode of inheritance relates to both the genetic mechanism, i.e., the number of loci implicated in the etiology of the disease, and the genotype-phenotype relation, which describes the influence of these loci on the trait. Having an idea of the genetic model can crucially facilitate the mapping process. This holds especially in the context of linkage analysis, where an appropriate parametric model or a suitable nonparametric allele sharing statistic may accordingly be selected. Here, we review the difficulties with parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis when applied to multifactorial diseases. We address the question why it is necessary to adequately model a genetically complex trait in a linkage study, and elucidate the steps to do so. Furthermore, we discuss the value of including unaffected individuals into the analysis, as well as of looking at larger pedigrees, both with parametric and nonparametric methods. Our considerations and suggestions aim at guiding researchers to genotyping individuals at a trait locus as accurately as possible. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 210
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases [J].
Abreu, PC ;
Greenberg, DA ;
Hodge, SE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 65 (03) :847-857
[2]  
BLACKWELDER W C, 1985, Genetic Epidemiology, V2, P85, DOI 10.1002/gepi.1370020109
[3]   Genetic analysis of a common oligogenic trait with quantitative correlates: Summary of GAW9 results [J].
Blangero, J .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 12 (06) :689-706
[4]   STRATEGIES BASED ON MARKER INFORMATION FOR THE STUDY OF HUMAN-DISEASES [J].
CLERGETDARPOUX, F ;
BONAITIPELLIE, C .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1992, 56 :145-153
[5]   EFFECTS OF MIS-SPECIFYING GENETIC-PARAMETERS IN LOD SCORE ANALYSIS [J].
CLERGETDARPOUX, F ;
BONAITIPELLIE, C ;
HOCHEZ, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1986, 42 (02) :393-399
[6]   Trials of the beta model for complex inheritance [J].
Collins, A ;
MacLean, CJ ;
Morton, NE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (17) :9177-9181
[7]   ROBUST GENETIC-LINKAGE ANALYSIS BASED ON A SCORE TEST OF HOMOGENEITY - THE WEIGHTED PAIRWISE CORRELATION STATISTIC [J].
COMMENGES, D .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 11 (02) :189-200
[8]  
CURTIS D, 1995, AM J HUM GENET, V57, P703
[9]   Comparison of nonparametric statistics for detection of linkage in nuclear families: Single-marker evaluation [J].
Davis, S ;
Weeks, DE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1997, 61 (06) :1431-1444
[10]  
DAY NE, 1976, TISSUE ANTIGENS, V8, P109