Conformational selection in silico:: Loop latching motions and ligand binding in enzymes

被引:20
作者
Wong, Sergio [1 ]
Jacobson, Matthew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
关键词
docking; molecular dynamics; enzyme-substrate recognition; induced fit;
D O I
10.1002/prot.21666
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ligand binding frequently induces significant conformational changes in a protein receptor. Understanding and predicting such conformational changes represent an important challenge for computational biology, including applications to structure-based drug design. We describe an approach to this problem based on the assumption that the holo state is at least transiently populated in the absence of a ligand; this hypothesis has been referred to as "conformational selection." Here, we apply a method that tests this hypothesis on a challenging class of ligand-induced conformational changes, which we refer to as loop latching: the closing of a loop around an active site that sequesters the ligand from solvent. The method uses a combination of replica exchange molecular dynamics and a loop prediction algorithm to generate low-energy loop structures, and docking to select the conformation appropriate for binding a particular ligand. On a test set of six proteins, it yields loop structures including hololike conformations, generally below 2 angstrom RMSD from the liganded structure, for loops that span up to 15 residues. Docking serves as a stringent test of the predictions. In five of the six cases, the predicted loop conformations improve the ranks of cognate ligands relative to using the apo structure, although the results remain, in most cases, significantly worse than using a holo structure. The poses of the cognate ligands are correct in four of the six test cases, while they are correct for five of the six using a holo structure.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[61]  
*SCHROD INC, 2004, GLIDE
[62]   Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects [J].
Sherman, W ;
Day, T ;
Jacobson, MP ;
Friesner, RA ;
Farid, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 49 (02) :534-553
[63]   All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein [J].
Simmerling, C ;
Strockbine, B ;
Roitberg, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 124 (38) :11258-11259
[64]  
STUCKEY JA, 1994, NATURE, V370, P571, DOI 10.1038/370571a0
[65]   Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding [J].
Sugita, Y ;
Okamoto, Y .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1999, 314 (1-2) :141-151
[66]   Conformational dynamics of the active site loop of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase illuminated by site-directed spin labeling [J].
Taylor, JC ;
Markham, GD .
ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2003, 415 (02) :164-171
[67]   FDS: Flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function [J].
Taylor, RD ;
Jewsbury, PJ ;
Essex, JW .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 24 (13) :1637-1656
[68]   The structure of the complex between rubisco and its natural substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate [J].
Taylor, TC ;
Andersson, I .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 265 (04) :432-444
[69]   Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery [J].
Teague, SJ .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2003, 2 (07) :527-541
[70]   Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design [J].
Teodoro, ML ;
Kavraki, LE .
CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2003, 9 (20) :1635-1648