The station-holding performance of the plaice Pleuronectes platessa on artificial substratum ripples

被引:39
作者
Gerstner, CL [1 ]
Webb, PW
机构
[1] MAFF, Fisheries Lab, Lowestoft NR33 OHT, Suffolk, England
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE | 1998年 / 76卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/cjz-76-2-260
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The ability to maintain position in a cut-rent (station-holding) was determined for the plaice Pleuronectes platessa on a simple form of habitat structure, substratum ripples. Twelve sinusoidal combinations of ripple wavelength and amplitude were tested, with wavelengths approximating 0.5, 1.2, and 5 times fish total length. Although ripple flow patterns varied, all provided regions of retarded flow in the ripple troughs. Therefore, ripples affected station-holding performance in the following three ways: (1) directly, by providing regions of retarded flow, thus creating flow refuges, (2) indirectly, by interfering with behaviors deferring the onset of active swimming, and (3) indirectly, by providing opportunities for new behaviors deferring swimming. The direct effects of retarded flow on performance versus indirect effects via swim-deferring behavior were evaluated. Flow retardation was measured as the velocity ratio (u(through)/u(free-stream)), where u(through) is the velocity measured 0.5 cm from the bottom of a trough and u(free-stream) is the velocity measured 10 cm above ripple crests. At a velocity ratio >0.4, direct flow-retardation effects were most important in determining observed performance. At a velocity ratio <0.4, indirect interference affected performance. Performance of plaice was maximized on ripples with wavelengths approximately twice their total body length.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 268
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]  
WILKINSON L, 1990, SYSTAT SYSTME STAT
[22]  
Winer B. J., 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT
[23]   CLARIFICATION OF THE CRITERIA USED TO IDENTIFY NEAR-BED FLOW REGIMES [J].
YOUNG, WJ .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1992, 28 (03) :383-391