A randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) for mild to moderate alcohol dependence

被引:83
作者
Sellman, JD [1 ]
Sullivan, PF [1 ]
Dore, GM [1 ]
Adamson, SJ [1 ]
MacEwan, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Christchurch Sch Med, Dept Psychol Med, Natl Ctr Treatment Dev Alcohol Drugs & Addict, Christchurch, New Zealand
来源
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL | 2001年 / 62卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.15288/jsa.2001.62.389
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study was designed to conduct a randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) with two control conditions: nondirective reflective listening (NDRL) and no further counseling (NFC); and to conduct this study in a sample of patients with a primary diagnosis of mild to moderate alcohol dependence, in a "real-life" clinical setting. Method: Patients with mild to moderate alcohol dependence were recruited assessed and treated at the Community Alcohol and Drug Service of Christchurch, New Zealand. All patients received a feedback/education session before randomization to either four sessions of MET, four sessions of NDRL, or NFC. Outcome data on 122 subjects (57.4% men) were obtained 6 months following the end of treatment, by an interviewer who was blind to the treatment condition. The primary drinking outcome was unequivocal heavy drinking, defined as drinking 10 or more standard drinks six or more times in the follow-up period. Global assessment scale (GAS) measured general personal/social functioning. Results: Of patients treated with MET 42.9% showed unequivocal heavy drinking compared with 62.5% of the NDRL rand 65.0% of the NFC groups (p = .04). No significant differences were found for GAS score according to treatment condition. Conclusions: In patients with mild to moderate alcohol dependence, MET is more effective for reducing unequivocal heavy drinking than either a feedback/education session alone or four sessions of NDRL. MET can be considered an effective "value added" counseling intervention in a real-life clinical setting. In patients with mild to moderate alcohol dependence, nondirective reflective listening provides no additional advantage over a feedback/education session alone.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 396
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   COMMON FEATURES OF PSYCHOTHERAPY [J].
FRANK, JD .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1972, 6 (01) :34-40
[12]   PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE READINESS TO CHANGE QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
HEATHER, N ;
ROLLNICK, S ;
BELL, A .
ADDICTION, 1993, 88 (12) :1667-1677
[13]   THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT FOR ALCOHOLISM - A 1ST APPROXIMATION [J].
HOLDER, H ;
LONGABAUGH, R ;
MILLER, WR ;
RUBONIS, AV .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1991, 52 (06) :517-540
[14]  
MACEWAN I, 1995, YOUR DRINKING YOUR H
[15]  
MACEWAN I, 1995, UPPER LIMITS RESPONS
[16]  
MACEWAN I, 1995, DRINKING YOUR HLTH C
[17]  
MEADOR BD, 1979, CURRENT PSYCHOTHERAP, P131
[18]   The 'big bang' approach to sessional drinking: Changing patterns of alcohol consumption amongst young people in North West England [J].
Measham, F .
ADDICTION RESEARCH, 1996, 4 (03) :283-299
[19]  
Mechanic D, 1996, PSYCHIATR SERV, V47, P371
[20]  
Miller W.R., 1991, MOTIVATIONAL INTERVI, DOI DOI 10.1097/01445442-200305000-00013