A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

被引:823
作者
Waltman, Ludo [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Bibliographic database; Citation analysis; Citation impact indicator; Counting method; Normalization; AUTHOR SELF-CITATIONS; HIGHLY CITED PAPERS; SUB-FIELD NORMALIZATION; GOOGLE SCHOLAR COVERAGE; H-INDEX; JOURNAL IMPACT; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; SCIENTIFIC IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Citation impact indicators nowadays play an important role in research evaluation, and consequently these indicators have received a lot of attention in the bibliometric and scientometric literature. This paper provides an in-depth review of the literature on citation impact indicators. First, an overview is given of the literature on bibliographic databases that can be used to calculate citation impact indicators (Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar). Next, selected topics in the literature on citation impact indicators are reviewed in detail. The first topic is the selection of publications and citations to be included in the calculation of citation impact indicators. The second topic is the normalization of citation impact indicators, in particular normalization for field differences. Counting methods for dealing with co-authored publications are the third topic, and citation impact indicators for journals are the last topic. The paper concludes by offering some recommendations for future research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 391
页数:27
相关论文
共 347 条
[1]   Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship [J].
Abbas, Ash Mohammad .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 88 (01) :107-131
[2]   How do you define and measure research productivity? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (02) :1129-1144
[3]   The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Rosati, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (01) :198-208
[4]   How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (04) :645-654
[5]   Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (04) :470-479
[6]   A sensitivity analysis of research institutions' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :298-306
[7]   A sensitivity analysis of researchers' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :192-201
[8]   Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (04) :659-667
[9]   Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: could the latter ever be preferable? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Di Costa, Flavia .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 84 (03) :821-833
[10]   Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact [J].
Adams, J .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 63 (03) :567-581