Formal integration archetypes in ambidextrous organizations

被引:29
作者
Chen, Rongxin Roger [1 ]
Kannan-Narasimhan, Rangapriya Priya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Francisco, Sch Management, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[2] Univ San Diego, Sch Business Adm, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
关键词
MEDIATING ROLE; AMBIDEXTERITY; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/radm.12083
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research suggests that organizational ambidexterity, an organization's capacity to pursue both exploratory and exploitative activities, is critical to firm innovation and performance. Extant research primarily emphasizes several firm-level informal integration mechanisms, such as creating a common vision and relying on social integration, for integrating structurally ambidextrous units. Research has largely ignored, however, the formal mechanisms by which organizations have integrated such units. In this inductive study, using archival and interview data from organizations in Silicon Valley, we address this gap by identifying the formal integration archetypes that enable core business units to collaborate with new venture units to incubate new businesses. The four integration archetypes that enable collaboration vary along two key dimensions: who initiates new ventures and when collaboration is solicited. We identify formal administrative and resource mechanisms that enable such collaboration. We combine the disparate literatures of temporal and spatial separation of ambidextrous structures, and demonstrate how these must be combined at the business unit and new venture levels of analysis to achieve integration. The practical contribution of this study lies in identifying suitable contexts in which each of these archetypes can be utilized by practitioners for reintegrating new venture projects developed in separate structures.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 286
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system
    Adler, PS
    Goldoftas, B
    Levine, DI
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) : 43 - 68
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, REGIONAL ADVANTAGE C, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1957, Administrative behavior
  • [5] Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited
    Benner, MJ
    Tushman, ML
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) : 238 - 256
  • [6] Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms
    Burgers, J. Henri
    Jansen, Justin J. P.
    Van den Bosch, Frans A. J.
    Volberda, Henk W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2009, 24 (03) : 206 - 220
  • [7] Strategy as practice?
    Carter, Chris
    Clegg, Stewart R.
    Kornberger, Martin
    [J]. STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2008, 6 (01) : 83 - 99
  • [8] Djella F., 2001, Science and Public Policy, V28, P57
  • [9] Duncan R. B., 1976, MANAGEMENT ORG, V1, P167
  • [10] A Study of the Performativity of the "Ambidextrous Organizations" Theory: Neither Lost in nor Lost before Translation
    Durisin, Boris
    Todorova, Gergana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 : 53 - 75