ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens

被引:232
作者
Herr, DL
Sum-Ping, STJ
England, M
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[3] Durham VAMC, Durham, NC USA
[4] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
alpha(2)-adrenoceptors; imidazoles; sedation; sympatholysis; cardiac artery bypass graft;
D O I
10.1016/S1053-0770(03)00200-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare dexmedetomidine-based to propofol-based sedation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Randomized, open label. Setting: Twenty-five centers in the United States and Canada. Participants: Two hundred ninety-five adults undergoing CABG surgery. Interventions: At sternal closure, patients in group A received 1.0 mug/kg of dexmedetomidine over 20 minutes and then 0.2 to 0.7 mug/kg/h to maintain a Ramsay sedation score greater than or equal to3 during assisted ventilation and greater than or equal to2 after extubation. Patients could be given propofol for additional sedation if necessary; group B patients received propofol-based care according to each investigator's standard practice. Measurements and Main Results: Mean sedation levels were within target ranges in both groups. Mean times to weaning and extubation were similar, although fewer dexmedetomidine patients remained on the ventilator beyond 8 hours. Morphine use was significantly reduced in the dexmedetomidine group. Only 28% of the dexmedetomidine patients required morphine for pain relief while ventilated versus 69% of propofol-based patients (p < 0.001). Propofol patients required 4 times the mean dose of morphine while in the ICU. Mean blood pressure increased initially in both groups, then decreased to 3 mmHg below baseline in dexmedetomidine patients; mean arterial pressure remained at 9 mmHg above baseline in propofol patients. No ventricular tachycardia occurred in the dexmedetomidine-sedated patients compared with 5% of the propofol patients (p = 0.007). Respiratory rates and blood gases were similar. Fewer dexmedetomidine patients received beta-blockers (p = 0.014), antiemetics (p = 0.015), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p < 0.001), epinephrine (p = 0.030), or high-dose diuretics (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provided safe and effective sedation for post-CABG surgical patients and significantly reduced the use of analgesics, beta-blockers, antiemetics, epinephrine, and diuretics. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 584
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   DEXMEDETOMIDINE, AN ALPHA-2-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST, REDUCES ANESTHETIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING MINOR GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY [J].
AANTAA, R ;
KANTO, J ;
SCHEININ, M ;
KALLIO, A ;
SCHEININ, H .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (02) :230-235
[2]   COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
AITKENHEAD, AR ;
WILLATTS, SM ;
PARK, GR ;
COLLINS, CH ;
LEDINGHAM, IM ;
PEPPERMAN, ML ;
COATES, PD ;
BODENHAM, AR ;
SMITH, MB ;
WALLACE, PGM .
LANCET, 1989, 2 (8665) :704-709
[3]   Introduction of sedative, analgesic, and neuromuscular blocking agent guidelines in a medical intensive care unit: Physician and nurse adherence [J].
Bair, N ;
Bobek, MB ;
Hoffman-Hogg, L ;
Mion, LC ;
Slomka, J ;
Arroliga, AC .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (03) :707-713
[4]   OPTIMAL INTRAVENOUS DOSING STRATEGIES FOR SEDATIVES AND ANALGESICS IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
BARR, J ;
DONNER, A .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1995, 11 (04) :827-&
[5]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .1. SEDATION, VENTILATION, AND METABOLIC-RATE [J].
BELLEVILLE, JP ;
WARD, DS ;
BLOOR, BC ;
MAZE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1125-1133
[6]   The ethics of practice guidelines [J].
Berger, JT ;
Rosner, F .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (18) :2051-2056
[7]  
Bradley C, 2000, Intensive Crit Care Nurs, V16, P328, DOI 10.1054/iccn.2000.1529
[8]   HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES DURING ANESTHESIA INDUCED AND MAINTAINED WITH PROPOFOL [J].
CLAEYS, MA ;
GEPTS, E ;
CAMU, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (01) :3-9
[9]  
COLOMBO JA, 2001, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V95, pA381
[10]  
Coursin D B, 2001, Curr Opin Crit Care, V7, P221, DOI 10.1097/00075198-200108000-00002