Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements

被引:17
作者
Boone, JM
Yu, T
Seibert, JA
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, UC Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento
关键词
modulation transfer function; charge coupled device; Line spread function; sinusoid;
D O I
10.1118/1.597840
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The modulation transfer function (MTF) is a commonly used metric for defining the spatial resolution characteristics of imaging systems. While the MTF is defined in terms of how an imaging system demodulates the amplitude of a sinusoidal input, this approach has not been in general use to measure MTFs in the medical imaging community because producing sinusoidal x-ray patterns is technically difficult. However, for optical systems such as charge coupled devices (CCD), which are rapidly becoming a part of many medical digital imaging systems, the direct measurement of modulation at discrete spatial frequencies using a sinusoidal test pattern is practical. A commercially available optical test pattern containing spatial frequencies ranging from 0.375 cycles/mm to 80 cycles/mm was used to determine the MTF of a CCD-based optical system. These results were compared with the angulated slit method of Fujita [H. Fujita, D. Tsia, T. Itoh, K Doi, J. Morishita, K. Ueda, and A Ohtsuka, ''A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography,'' IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 11, 34-39 (1992)]. The use of a semiautomated profile iterated reconstruction technique (PIRT) is introduced, where the shift factor between successive pixel rows (due to angulation) is optimized iteratively by least-squares error analysis rather than by hand measurement of the slit angle. PIRT was used to find the slit angle for the Fujita technique and to find the sine-pattern angle for the sine-pattern technique. Computer simulation of PIRT for the case of the slit image (a line spread function) demonstrated that it produced a more accurate angle determination than ''hand'' measurement, and there is a significant difference between the errors in the two techniques (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, p < 0.001). The sine-pattern method and the Fujita slit method produced comparable MTF curves for the CCD camera evaluated. (C) 1996 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1955 / 1963
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条