Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories

被引:199
作者
Ciatto, S
Houssami, N
Apruzzese, A
Bassetti, E
Brancato, B
Carozzi, F
Catarzi, S
Lamberini, MP
Marcelli, G
Pellizzoni, R
Pesce, B
Risso, G
Russo, F
Scorsolini, A
机构
[1] Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, I-50131 Florence, Italy
[2] Westmead Hosp, NSW Breast Canc Inc, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Programme, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
breast cancer; diagnosis; mammography;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2004.12.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The inter- and intraobserver agreement (kappa-statistic) in reporting according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS (R)) breast density categories was tested in 12 dedicated breast radiologists reading a digitized set of 100 two-view mammograms. Average intraobserver agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.71, range 0.32-0.88) on a four-grade scale (D1/D2/D3/D4) and almost perfect (kappa = 0.81, range 0.62-1.00) on a two-grade scale (D1-2/D3-4). Average interobserver agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.54, range 0.02-0.77) on a four-grade scale and substantial (kappa = 0.71, range 0.31-0.88) on a two-grade scale. Major disagreement was found for intermediate categories (D2 = 0.25, D3 = 0.28). Categorization of breast density according to BI-RADS is feasible and consistency is good within readers and reasonable between readers. Interobserver inconsistency does occur, and checking the adoption of proper criteria through a proficiency test and appropriate training might be useful. As inconsistency is probably due to erroneous perception of classification criteria, standard sets of reference images should be made available for training. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[2]   Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Dite, GS ;
Stone, J ;
Gunasekara, A ;
English, DR ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Giles, GG ;
Tritchler, D ;
Chiarelli, A ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hopper, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :886-894
[3]   OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
WOLFSON, C ;
MOSKOWITZ, M ;
CARLILE, T ;
PETITCLERC, C ;
FERRI, HA ;
FISHELL, E ;
GREGOIRE, A ;
KIERNAN, M ;
LONGLEY, JD ;
SIMOR, IS ;
MILLER, AB .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (06) :465-472
[4]  
Brisson J, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P728
[5]   MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING - AN INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF 2-VIEW VERSUS ONE-VIEW PROCEDURES IN LONDON [J].
BRYAN, S ;
BROWN, J ;
WARREN, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 (01) :70-78
[6]   Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years [J].
Buist, DSM ;
Porter, PL ;
Lehman, C ;
Taplin, SH ;
White, E .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (19) :1432-1440
[7]   Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates? [J].
Chen, ZJ ;
Wu, AH ;
Gauderman, WJ ;
Bernstein, L ;
Ma, HY ;
Pike, MC ;
Ursin, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 159 (02) :140-147
[8]   Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Visioli, C ;
Paci, E ;
Zappa, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (02) :393-396
[9]  
Ciatto S, 2001, Radiol Med, V101, P39
[10]   Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Del Turco, MR ;
Burke, P ;
Visioli, C ;
Paci, E ;
Zappa, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (09) :1645-1649