Ginsenoside Rf, a trace component of ginseng root, produces antinociception in mice

被引:67
作者
Mogil, JS
Shin, YH
McCleskey, EW
Kim, SC
Nah, SY
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Vollum Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Korea Ginseng & Tobacco Res Inst, Taejon, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Physiol, Coll Vet Med, Kwangju 500757, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ginseng; ginsenoside; analgesia; pain modality;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00133-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Ginseng root, a traditional oriental medicine, contains more than a dozen biologically active saponins called ginsenosides, including one present in only trace amounts called ginsenoside-Rf (Rf). Previously, we showed that Rf inhibits Ca2+ channels in mammalian sensory neurons through a mechanism requiring G-proteins, whereas a variety of other ginsenosides were relatively ineffective. Since inhibition of Ca2+ channels in sensory neurons contributes to antinociception by opioids, we tested for analgesic actions of Rf. We find dose-dependent antinociception by systemic administration of Rf in mice using two separate assays of tonic pain: in the acetic acid abdominal constriction test, the EDS, was 56 +/- 9 mg/kg, a concentration similar to those reported for aspirin and acetaminophen in the same assay; in the tonic phase of the biphasic formalin test, the ED50 was 129 +/- 32 mg/kg. Rf failed to affect nociception measured in three assays of acute pain: the acute phase of the formalin test, and the thermal (49 degrees C) tail-flick and increasing-temperature (3 degrees C/min) hot-plate tests. The simplest explanation is that Rf inhibits tonic pain without affecting acute pain, but other possibilities exist. Seeking a cellular explanation for the effect, we tested whether Rf suppresses Ca2+ channels on identified nociceptors. Inhibition was seen on large, but not small, nociceptors. This is inconsistent with a selective effect on tonic pain, so it seems unlikely that Ca2+ channel inhibition on primary sensory neurons can fully explain the behavioral antinociception we have demonstrated for Rf. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 228
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   APPARENT LACK OF TOLERANCE IN THE FORMALIN TEST SUGGESTS DIFFERENT MECHANISMS FOR MORPHINE ANALGESIA IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF PAIN [J].
ABBOTT, FV ;
FRANKLIN, KBJ ;
LUDWICK, RJ ;
MELZACK, R .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1981, 15 (04) :637-640
[2]   BRAIN-STEM LESIONS DISSOCIATE NEURAL MECHANISMS OF MORPHINE ANALGESIA IN DIFFERENT KINDS OF PAIN [J].
ABBOTT, FV ;
MELZACK, R .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1982, 251 (01) :149-155
[3]   PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL ANTINOCICEPTIVE ACTIONS OF ETHYLKETOCYCLAZOCINE IN THE FORMALIN TEST [J].
ABBOTT, FV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 152 (1-2) :93-100
[4]   PERCEPTION OF PULPAL PAIN AS A FUNCTION OF INTRADENTAL NERVE ACTIVITY [J].
AHLQUIST, ML ;
EDWALL, LGA ;
FRANZEN, OG ;
HAEGERSTAM, GAT .
PAIN, 1984, 19 (04) :353-366
[5]  
[Anonymous], ADV PAIN RES THERAPY
[6]  
[Anonymous], APS J
[7]   EVIDENCE FOR AN ACTION OF MORPHINE AND THE ENKEPHALINS ON SENSORY NERVE-ENDINGS IN THE MOUSE PERITONEUM [J].
BENTLEY, GA ;
NEWTON, SH ;
STARR, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 73 (02) :325-332
[8]   THE EFFECT OF PANAX-GINSENG ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOLERANCE TO THE PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIONS OF MORPHINE IN THE RAT [J].
BHARGAVA, HN ;
RAMARAO, P .
GENERAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 22 (03) :521-525
[9]  
BRASE DA, 1977, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V201, P368
[10]   CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM PLASTICITY IN THE TONIC PAIN RESPONSE TO SUBCUTANEOUS FORMALIN INJECTION [J].
CODERRE, TJ ;
VACCARINO, AL ;
MELZACK, R .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 535 (01) :155-158