Ginsenoside Rf, a trace component of ginseng root, produces antinociception in mice

被引:67
作者
Mogil, JS
Shin, YH
McCleskey, EW
Kim, SC
Nah, SY
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Vollum Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Korea Ginseng & Tobacco Res Inst, Taejon, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Physiol, Coll Vet Med, Kwangju 500757, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ginseng; ginsenoside; analgesia; pain modality;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00133-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Ginseng root, a traditional oriental medicine, contains more than a dozen biologically active saponins called ginsenosides, including one present in only trace amounts called ginsenoside-Rf (Rf). Previously, we showed that Rf inhibits Ca2+ channels in mammalian sensory neurons through a mechanism requiring G-proteins, whereas a variety of other ginsenosides were relatively ineffective. Since inhibition of Ca2+ channels in sensory neurons contributes to antinociception by opioids, we tested for analgesic actions of Rf. We find dose-dependent antinociception by systemic administration of Rf in mice using two separate assays of tonic pain: in the acetic acid abdominal constriction test, the EDS, was 56 +/- 9 mg/kg, a concentration similar to those reported for aspirin and acetaminophen in the same assay; in the tonic phase of the biphasic formalin test, the ED50 was 129 +/- 32 mg/kg. Rf failed to affect nociception measured in three assays of acute pain: the acute phase of the formalin test, and the thermal (49 degrees C) tail-flick and increasing-temperature (3 degrees C/min) hot-plate tests. The simplest explanation is that Rf inhibits tonic pain without affecting acute pain, but other possibilities exist. Seeking a cellular explanation for the effect, we tested whether Rf suppresses Ca2+ channels on identified nociceptors. Inhibition was seen on large, but not small, nociceptors. This is inconsistent with a selective effect on tonic pain, so it seems unlikely that Ca2+ channel inhibition on primary sensory neurons can fully explain the behavioral antinociception we have demonstrated for Rf. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 228
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]  
PAIK N H, 1982, Archives of Pharmacal Research (Seoul), V5, P7, DOI 10.1007/BF02856357
[42]   EFFECTS INDUCED BY CYSTEAMINE ON CHEMICALLY-INDUCED NOCICEPTION IN MICE [J].
PIERETTI, S ;
DIGIANNUARIO, A ;
CAPASSO, A ;
SORRENTINO, L ;
LOIZZO, A .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1994, 54 (15) :1091-1099
[43]   ETHANOL-INDUCED ANALGESIA [J].
POHORECKY, LA ;
SHAH, P .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1987, 41 (10) :1289-1295
[44]   Formalin-evoked activity in identified primary afferent fibers: Systemic lidocaine suppresses phase-2 activity [J].
Puig, S ;
Sorkin, LS .
PAIN, 1996, 64 (02) :345-355
[45]   ANTAGONISM OF THE ACUTE PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIONS OF MORPHINE BY PANAX-GINSENG EXTRACT [J].
RAMARAO, P ;
BHARGAVA, HN .
GENERAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 21 (06) :877-880
[46]   GR94839, A K-OPIOID AGONIST WITH LIMITED ACCESS TO THE CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM, HAS ANTINOCICEPTIVE ACTIVITY [J].
ROGERS, H ;
BIRCH, PJ ;
HARRISON, SM ;
PALMER, E ;
MANCHEE, GR ;
JUDD, DB ;
NAYLOR, A ;
SCOPES, DIC ;
HAYES, AG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 106 (04) :783-789
[47]   THE FORMALIN TEST IN MICE - EFFECT OF FORMALIN CONCENTRATION [J].
ROSLAND, JH ;
TJOLSEN, A ;
MAEHLE, B ;
HOLE, K .
PAIN, 1990, 42 (02) :235-242
[48]   SPINAL PAIN SUPPRESSION MECHANISMS MAY DIFFER FOR PHASIC AND TONIC PAIN [J].
RYAN, SM ;
WATKINS, LR ;
MAYER, DJ ;
MAIER, SF .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1985, 334 (01) :172-175
[49]   PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES OF PANAX GINSENG LEAVES [J].
SAITO, H ;
MORITA, M ;
TAKAGI, K .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1973, 23 (01) :43-56
[50]   ACTIVATION OF MU-OPIOID RECEPTORS INHIBITS TRANSIENT HIGH-THRESHOLD AND LOW-THRESHOLD CA2+ CURRENTS, BUT SPARES A SUSTAINED CURRENT [J].
SCHROEDER, JE ;
FISCHBACH, PS ;
ZHENG, D ;
MCCLESKEY, EW .
NEURON, 1991, 6 (01) :13-20