Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation

被引:29
作者
Bain, AC
Swerdlow, CD
Love, CJ
Ellenbogen, KA
Deering, TF
Brewer, JE
Augostini, RS
Tchou, PJ
机构
[1] Survivalink Corp, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Med Ctr Virginia, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Pacemaker Surveillance Clin, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mem.2001.111690
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The efficacy of a shock waveform for external defibrillation depends on the waveform characteristics. Recently, design principles based on cardiac electrophysiology have been developed to determine optimal waveform characteristics. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of principles-based monophasic and biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation. Methods: A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study of 118 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing or receiving an implantable defibrillator was conducted. Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and defibrillation was attempted in each patient with a biphasic and a monophasic waveform. Patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: group 1 received shocks of escalating energy, and group 2 received only high-energy shocks. Results: The biphasic waveform achieved a first-shock success rate of 100% in group 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.1% to 100%) and group 2 (95% CI 94.6% to 100%), with average delivered energies of 201+/-17 J and 295+/-28 J, respectively. The monophasic waveform demonstrated a 96.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 215+/-12 J for group 1 and a 98.2% 195% CI 91.7% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 352+/-13 J for group 2. Conclusion: Using principles of electrophysiology, it is possible to design both biphasic and monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation that achieve a high first-shock efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 12
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   THERAPEUTIC INDEXES FOR TRANSCHEST DEFIBRILLATOR SHOCKS - EFFECTIVE, DAMAGING, AND LETHAL ELECTRICAL DOSES [J].
BABBS, CF ;
TACKER, WA ;
VANVLEET, JF ;
BOURLAND, JD ;
GEDDES, LA .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1980, 99 (06) :734-738
[2]   TRUNCATED BIPHASIC PULSES FOR TRANSTHORACIC DEFIBRILLATION [J].
BARDY, GH ;
GLINER, BE ;
KUDENCHUK, PJ ;
POOLE, JE ;
DOLACK, GL ;
JONES, GK ;
ANDERSON, J ;
TROUTMAN, C ;
JOHNSON, G .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (06) :1768-1774
[3]   Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation [J].
Bardy, GH ;
Marchlinski, FE ;
Sharma, AD ;
Worley, SJ ;
Luceri, RM ;
Yee, R ;
Halperin, BD ;
Fellows, CL ;
Ahern, TS ;
Chilson, DA ;
Packer, DL ;
Wilber, DJ ;
Mattioni, TA ;
Reddy, R ;
Kronmal, RA ;
Lazzara, R .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (10) :2507-2514
[4]   A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED EVALUATION OF BIPHASIC VERSUS MONOPHASIC WAVEFORM PULSES ON DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY IN HUMANS [J].
BARDY, GH ;
IVEY, TD ;
ALLEN, MD ;
JOHNSON, G ;
MEHRA, R ;
GREENE, HL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 14 (03) :728-733
[5]   Truncated exponential versus damped sinusoidal waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation [J].
Behr, JC ;
Hartley, LL ;
York, DK ;
Brown, DD ;
Kerber, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (11) :1242-1245
[6]  
Blair HA, 1932, J GEN PHYSIOL, V15, P731, DOI 10.1085/jgp.15.6.731
[7]   On the intensity-time relations for stimulation by electric currents. I [J].
Blair, HA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1932, 15 (06) :709-729
[8]   OPTIMIZING DEFIBRILLATION THROUGH IMPROVED WAVE-FORMS [J].
BLOCK, M ;
BREITHARDT, G .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (03) :526-538
[9]  
BOCKA JJ, 1991, PREHOSPITAL DIASTER, V6, P415
[10]   COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC TRUNCATED EXPONENTIAL SHOCKS FOR NONTHORACOTOMY INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION IN DOGS [J].
CHAPMAN, PD ;
VETTER, JW ;
SOUZA, JJ ;
TROUP, PJ ;
WETHERBEE, JN ;
HOFFMANN, RG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (03) :739-745