Decentralized generation of electricity with solid oxide fuel cells from centrally converted biomass

被引：20

作者：

Toonssen, Richard ^{[1
]}

Woudstra, Nico ^{[1
]}

Verkooijen, Adrian H. M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Mech Marine & Mat Engn, Proc & Energy Dept, Sect Energy Technol, NL-2628 CA Delft, Netherlands

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY | 2010年 / 35卷 / 14期

关键词：

Biomass gasification; Solid oxide fuel cell; Exergy analysis; Decentralized power production; EXERGY ANALYSIS; COMBINED-CYCLE; SOFC-MGT; GASIFICATION; SYSTEM; HYDROGEN; EFFICIENCIES; FEASIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; HEAT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.006

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

A thermodynamic evaluation of different energy conversion chains based on centralized biomass gasification and decentralized heat and power production by a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) has been performed. Three different chains have been evaluated, the main difference between the chains is the secondary fuel produced via biomass gasification. The secondary fuels considered are hydrogen, synthetic natural gas (SNG) and syngas. These fuels are assumed to be distributed through a transport and distribution grid to the micro-combined heat and power (mu-CHP) systems based on a SOFC and a heat pump. Two systems for the generation of secondary fuels from biomass are modelled using Cycle-Tempo. The hydrogen plant and the syngas plant have been modelled. The efficiency of the synthetic natural gas plant is taken from literature. The mu-CHP systems on the different fuels have also been modelled in Cycle-Tempo. The chain from biomass based centralized gas production towards decentralized heat and power production has been evaluated. The overall exergy efficiency from biomass to heat and power is for the hydrogen route 21.1%, for the SNG route it is 28.4 and for the syngas route it is 30.4%. (C) 2010 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：7594 / 7607

页数：14

共 43 条

[11] Analysis of a SOFC energy generation system fuelled with biomass reformate
Cordiner, Stefano
Feola, Massimo
Mulone, Vincenzo
Romanelli, Fabio
[J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (04) : 738 - 747
[12] Exergetic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification integration with heat pipes
Fryda, L.
Panopoulos, K. D.
Karl, J.
Kakaras, E.
[J]. ENERGY, 2008, 33 (02) : 292 - 299
[13] Integrated CHP with autothermal biomass gasification and SOFC-MGT
Fryda, L.
Panopoulos, K. D.
Kakaras, E.
[J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 49 (02) : 281 - 290
[14] Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts
Gassner, Martin
Marechal, Francois
[J]. ENERGY, 2009, 34 (10) : 1744 - 1753
[15] Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass
Gassner, Martin
Marechal, Francois
[J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (11) : 1587 - 1604
[16] Thermodynamic performance study of an integrated gasification fuel cell combined cycle: an exergy analysis
Ghosh, S
De, S
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2003, 217 (A6) : 575 - 581
[17] Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass
Hamelinck, CN
Faaij, APC
[J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2002, 111 (01) : 1 - 22
[18] Hamelinck CN., 2001, FUTURE PROSPECTS PRO
[19] Hofbauer H., 2002, DEV THERMOCHEMICAL B
[20] Hofbauer H., 2002, P PYROLYSIS GASIFICA

← 1 2 3 4 5 →