Potential role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of tumors of the maxillary sinus

被引:54
作者
Adams, EJ
Nutting, CM
Convery, DJ
Cosgrove, VP
Henk, JM
Dearnaley, DP
Webb, S
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton, Surrey, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Acad Dept Radiotheray, Sutton, Surrey, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 51卷 / 03期
关键词
maxillary sinus tumors; conformal radiotherapy; intensity-modulated radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01655-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated. radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to see whether doses to critical structures could be reduced while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) coverage in patients receiving conventional radiotherapy (RT) for carcinoma of the maxillary sinus because of the risk of radiation-induced complications, particularly visual loss. Methods and Materials: Six patients who had recently received conventional RT for carcinoma of the maxillary sinus were studied. Conventional RT, 3D-CRT, and step-and-shoot IMRT plans were prepared using the same 2-field arrangement. The effect of reducing the number of segments in the IMRT beams was investigated. Results: 3D-CRT and IMRT reduced the brain and ipsilateral parotid gland doses compared with the conventional plans. IMRT reduced doses to both optic nerves; for the contralateral optic nerve, 15-segment IMRT plans delivered an average maximal dose of 56.4 Gy (range 53.9-59.3) compared with 65.7 Gy (range 65.3-65.9) and 64.2 Gy (range 61.4-65.6) for conventional RT and 3D-CRT, respectively. IMRT also gave improved PTV homogeneity and improved coverage, with an average of 8.5 % (range 7.0-11.7 %) of the volume receiving < 95 % of the prescription dose (64 Gy) compared with 14.7 % (range 14.1-15.9 %) and 15.1 % (range 14.4-16.1 %) with conventional RT and 3D-CRT, respectively. Little difference was found between the 15 and 7-segment plans, but 5 segments resulted in a reduced minimal PTV dose. Conclusions: IMRT offers significant advantages over conventional RT and 3D-CRT techniques for treatment of maxillary sinus tumors. Good results can be obtained from 7 segments per beam without compromising the PTV coverage. This number of segments is practical for implementation in a busy RT department. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION
    AHNESJO, A
    SAXNER, M
    TREPP, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) : 263 - 273
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
  • [3] A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation
    Cardinale, RM
    Benedict, SH
    Wu, QW
    Zwicker, RD
    Gaballa, HE
    Mohan, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02): : 431 - 436
  • [4] Comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer using conformal multisegmental fields: Assessment of target coverage and noninvolved tissue sparing
    Eisbruch, A
    Marsh, LH
    Martel, MK
    Ship, JA
    Ten Haken, R
    Pu, AT
    Fraass, BA
    Lichter, AS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (03): : 559 - 568
  • [5] Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    Ten Haken, RK
    Kim, HM
    Marsh, LH
    Ship, JA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03): : 577 - 587
  • [6] A GENERALIZED PENCIL BEAM ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMIZATION OF RADIATION-THERAPY
    GUSTAFSSON, A
    LIND, BK
    BRAHME, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (03) : 343 - 357
  • [7] GUSTAFSSON A, 1998, MED PHYS, V25, pA117
  • [8] RADIATION-DOSE TO THE LENS AND CATARACT FORMATION
    HENK, JM
    WHITELOCKE, RAF
    WARRINGTON, AP
    BESSELL, EM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (05): : 815 - 820
  • [9] Itami J, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P104, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980101)82:1<104::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-6