Apical Surgical Margins Status in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Depend on Disease Characteristics

被引:12
作者
Tsivian, Matvey [1 ]
Zilberman, Dorit E. [1 ]
Ferrandino, Michael N. [1 ]
Madden, John F. [2 ]
Mouraviev, Vladimir [1 ]
Albala, David M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Associated Med Profess, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; RISK; IMPACT; LOCATION; WEIGHT; GRADE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0336
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Positive surgical margins (PSM) during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) are generally considered an adverse event. We attempted to identify the factors associated with PSM and their location. Patients and Methods: Records of patients undergoing RALP between 2003 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. We collected demographic (age, race, body mass index [BMI]), cumulative surgical experience (years from RALP introduction at our center), clinical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels, and biopsy Gleason sums), nerve-sparing technique (yes/no), and pathological variables, including stage (organ-confined vs. non), Gleason sums, prostate weight, status, and location of the surgical margins. Multivariate regression models were constructed to identify the factors associated with PSM at prostate apex, periphery, proximal, and all locations. Results: A total of 560 patients were analyzed. Median age was 60.1 (interquartile range [IQR] 55.1-64.7), 19% were African-Americans, median BMI was 28.1 (25.8-30.8 kg/m(2)), PSA levels were 5.3 (3.9-7.1 ng/mL), and prostate weight was 45.2 (36.8-57.0 g). Gleason sums were as follows: <= 6 in 42.5%, 7 in 53.4%, and >7 in 3.1%. Overall, PSM were reported in 130 (23.2%), including 58 (44.6%) apical, 81 (62.3%) peripheral, and 20 (15.4%) proximal. The overall rate of PSM was associated with surgical experience, PSA, prostate weight, and Gleason sums. Apical PSM were independently associated only with surgical experience. Peripheral PSM were associated with PSA, stage, Gleason sums, and prostate weight. Finally, proximal margin status showed an association with PSA levels only. Conclusions: While peripheral, proximal, and overall PSM are largely associated with inherent disease biology (grade, PSA levels, etc.), apical margin status is independently associated only with cumulative surgical experience. These results suggest that a lower rates of positive apical margins may be obtained as the cumulative center experience grows, suggesting a potential role of a "teaching learning curve," independently from disease characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 365
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Robotic radical prostatectomy: A technique to reduce pT2 positive margins [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Eichel, L ;
Edwards, RA ;
Lee, DI ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (06) :1224-1228
[2]   Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes [J].
Atug, F ;
Castle, EP ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Burgess, SV ;
Thomas, R ;
Davis, R .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :866-872
[3]   Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients [J].
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Antebi, Elie ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Currlin, Eike ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Walz, Jochen ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Friedrich, Martin G. ;
Ahyai, Sascha A. ;
Eichelberg, Christian ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Erbersdobler, Andreas ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (06) :1204-1209
[4]   Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, James A. ;
Kurolwa, Kentaro ;
Ohorl, Makoto ;
Serlo, Angel M. ;
Gorbonos, Alex ;
Maru, Norio ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Slawin, Kevin M. ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (05) :965-969
[5]   Obese men have higher-grade and larger tumors: an analysis of the duke prostate center database [J].
Freedland, S. J. ;
Banez, L. L. ;
Sun, L. L. ;
Fitzsimons, N. J. ;
Moul, J. W. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2009, 12 (03) :259-263
[6]   Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: A search database study [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Isaacs, WB ;
Platz, EA ;
Terris, MK ;
Aronson, WJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Presti, JC ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7546-7554
[7]   The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Frota, Rodrigo ;
Turna, Burak ;
Santos, Bruno Mello R. ;
Lin, Yi-Chia ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Aron, Monish .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (05) :589-593
[8]  
Grene FL, 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[9]   The Impact of Prostate Size on Perioperative Outcomes in a Large Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Series [J].
Levinson, Adam W. ;
Ward, Nicholas T. ;
Sulman, Aaron ;
Mettee, Lynda Z. ;
Link, Richard E. ;
Su, Li-Ming ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) :147-152
[10]   Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors [J].
Liss, Michael ;
Osann, Kathryn ;
Ornstein, David .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 102 (05) :603-607