Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution

被引:96
作者
Freni, Gabriele [1 ]
Mannina, Giorgio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Enna Kore, Fac Ingn Architettura, I-94100 Enna, Italy
[2] Univ Palermo, Dipartimento Ingn Idraul Applicaz Ambientali, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
关键词
Bayesian approach; Prior knowledge; Uncertainty assessment; Urban stormwater quality modelling; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; STOCHASTIC-MODELS; COMBINED SEWER; EROSION; IDENTIFIABILITY; CALIBRATION; COMPLEXITY; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.043
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Mathematical models are of common use in urban drainage, and they are increasingly being applied to support decisions about design and alternative management strategies. In this context, uncertainty analysis is of undoubted necessity in urban drainage modelling. However, despite the crucial role played by uncertainty quantification, several methodological aspects need to be clarified and deserve further investigation, especially in water quality modelling. One of them is related to the "a priori" hypotheses involved in the uncertainty analysis. Such hypotheses are usually condensed in "a priori" distributions assessing the most likely values for model parameters. This paper explores Bayesian uncertainty estimation methods investigating the influence of the choice of these prior distributions. The research aims at gaining insights in the selection of the prior distribution and the effect the user-defined choice has on the reliability of the uncertainty analysis results. To accomplish this, an urban stormwater quality model developed in previous studies has been employed. The model has been applied to the Fossolo catchment (Italy), for which both quantity and quality data were available. The results show that a uniform distribution should be applied whenever no information is available for specific parameters describing the case study. The use of weak information (mostly coming from literature or other model applications) should be avoided because it can lead to wrong estimations of uncertainty in modelling results. Model parameter related hypotheses would be better dropped in these cases. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION
    BEVEN, K
    BINLEY, A
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) : 279 - 298
  • [12] AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS REVISITED, REBUTTED
    BOX, GEP
    COX, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 77 (377) : 209 - 210
  • [13] Predictive Uncertainty in Water-Quality Modeling
    Chin, David A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2009, 135 (12): : 1315 - 1325
  • [14] DELETIC A, 2009, P 8 INT C URB DRAIN
  • [15] Identifiability analysis for receiving water body quality modelling
    Freni, Gabriele
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Viviani, Gaspare
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2009, 24 (01) : 54 - 62
  • [16] Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology
    Freni, Gabriele
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Viviani, Gaspare
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (8-9) : 2061 - 2072
  • [17] Assessment of data availability influence on integrated urban drainage modelling uncertainty
    Freni, Gabriele
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Viviani, Gaspare
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2009, 24 (10) : 1171 - 1181
  • [18] Parameter interdependence and uncertainty induced by lumping in a hydrologic model
    Gallagher, Mark R.
    Doherty, John
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (05)
  • [19] Harremoës P, 1999, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V39, P1
  • [20] STOCHASTIC-MODELS FOR ESTIMATION OF EXTREME POLLUTION FROM URBAN RUNOFF
    HARREMOES, P
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1988, 22 (08) : 1017 - 1026