Evaluation of the donor liver for living donor liver transplantation

被引:47
作者
Brandhagen, D [1 ]
Fidler, J [1 ]
Rosen, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Transplant Ctr, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/jlts.2003.50222
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Key Points 1. Accurate assessment of the donor liver is an important component of the living donor liver evaluation and is critical to ensure a successful outcome for both donor and recipient. 2. Liver biochemistry tests, viral hepatitis serological tests, tests to exclude chronic liver disease, and volumetric computed tomographic or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the liver are performed routinely as part of the donor evaluation. 3. Liver biopsy should be a standard component of the donor evaluation in all donors, with the possible exception of those with a body mass index less than 25 who have normal liver test and abdominal imaging study results and no risk factors for chronic liver disease or hepatic steatosis. 4. The maximum acceptable percentage of steatosis in the donor liver is unknown, but most centers use an upper limit of 10% to 30%. 5. A graft-recipient body weight ratio of at least 0.8% provides the recipient with adequate hepatic mass in most situations. 6. Anatomic variants in donor biliary and hepatic vascular anatomy are common. 7. Evaluation of donor vascular anatomy varies among centers and includes MR or computed tomographic angiography and hepatic angiography. 8. Evaluation of biliary anatomy is performed most commonly using intraoperative cholangiography. Some centers use MR cholangiography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in selected situations.
引用
收藏
页码:S16 / S28
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [61] Failure of regeneration of the steatotic rat liver: Disruption at two different levels in the regeneration pathway
    Selzner, M
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 31 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [62] Mechanisms of ischemic injury are different in the steatotic and normal rat liver
    Selzner, M
    Rüdiger, HA
    Sindram, D
    Madden, J
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 32 (06) : 1280 - 1288
  • [63] ACUTE FATTY LIVER OF PREGNANCY AND THE MICROVESICULAR FAT DISEASES
    SHERLOCK, S
    [J]. GUT, 1983, 24 (04) : 265 - 269
  • [64] Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume
    Shirabe, K
    Shimada, M
    Gion, T
    Hasegawa, H
    Takenaka, K
    Utsunomiya, T
    Sugimachi, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 188 (03) : 304 - 309
  • [65] SHIRAKATA Y, 1995, TRANSPLANT P, V27, P545
  • [66] SILVERMAN JF, 1990, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V85, P1349
  • [67] ALOPECIA, ASCITES, AND INCOMPLETE REGENERATION AFTER 85 TO 90 PER CENT LIVER RESECTION
    STARZL, TE
    PUTNAM, CW
    GROTH, CG
    CORMAN, JL
    TAUBMAN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1975, 129 (05) : 587 - 590
  • [68] SUCCESSFUL LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION FROM A LIVING DONOR TO HER SON
    STRONG, RW
    LYNCH, SV
    ONG, TH
    MATSUNAMI, H
    KOIDO, Y
    BALDERSON, GA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (21) : 1505 - 1507
  • [69] PRIMARY NONFUNCTION OF HEPATIC ALLOGRAFTS WITH PREEXISTING FATTY INFILTRATION
    TODO, S
    DEMETRIS, AJ
    MAKOWKA, L
    TEPERMAN, L
    PODESTA, L
    SHAVER, T
    TZAKIS, A
    STARZL, TE
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1989, 47 (05) : 903 - 905
  • [70] TODO S, 1991, TRANSPLANTATION, V51, P157