Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool

被引:109
作者
Phielix, Chris [1 ]
Prins, Frans J.
Kirschner, Paul A. [2 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert
Jaspers, Jos
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Groupware; Peer assessment; Peer feedback; Reflection; Group performance; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MANAGING WORK GROUPS; FACE GROUPS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SELF-ASSESSMENT; VIRTUAL TEAMS; COMMUNICATION; METAANALYSIS; PARTICIPATION; VISUALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A peer feedback tool (Radar) and a reflection tool (Reflector) were used to enhance group performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Radar allows group members to assess themselves and their fellow group members on six traits related to social and cognitive behavior. Reflector stimulates group members to reflect on their past, present and future group functioning, stimulating them to set goals and formulate plans to improve their social and cognitive performance. The underlying assumption was that group performance would be positively influenced by making group members aware of how they, their peers and the whole group perceive their social and cognitive behavior in the group. Participants were 108 fourth-year high school students working in dyads, triads and groups of four on a collaborative writing task, with or without the tools. Results demonstrate that awareness stimulated by the peer feedback and reflection tools enhances group-process satisfaction and social performance of CSCL-groups. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1102
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, SYMLOG-A system for the multiple level observation of groups
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0260293990240405, 10.1080/0260293990240405]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[5]  
Bales R. F., 1988, SYMLOG PRACTITIONER, P319
[6]   Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis [J].
Baltes, BB ;
Dickson, MW ;
Sherman, MP ;
Bauer, CC ;
LaGanke, JS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 87 (01) :156-179
[7]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[8]  
Bellotti V., 1992, P ACM C COMP SUPP CO, P107, DOI [10.1145/143457.143468, DOI 10.1145/143457.143468]
[9]   QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF STUDENT SELF-ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER-EDUCATION - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS [J].
BOUD, D ;
FALCHIKOV, N .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1989, 18 (05) :529-549
[10]  
Boud D., 2013, REFLECTION TURNING E, P18, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315059051, 10.4324/9781315059051]