High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint - Image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers

被引:68
作者
Stehling, Christoph
Vieth, Volker
Bachmann, Rainald
Nassenstein, Isabelle
Kugel, Harald
Kooijman, Hendrik
Heindel, Walter
Fischbach, Roman
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Philips Med Syst, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
MRI; 3.0; Tesla; TMJ; disk;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000262081.23997.6b
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: To assess the image quality of a high-resolution imaging protocol for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) at 3.0 T and to compare it with our standard 1.5 T protocol. Materials and Methods: Fifteen volunteers without history of TMJ dysfunction underwent bilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the TMJ with the jaw in closed and open position. MRI was performed with using a 1.5 T (standard TMJ coil) and 3.0 T (purpose build phased array coil) MR system (Gyroscan Intera 1.5 T and 3.0 T; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Imaging protocols consisted of a parasagittal PDw-TSE sequence and a coronal PDw-TSE sequence in closed mouth position and a sagittal PDw-TSE sequence in open mouth position. Acquisition parameters were adjusted for 3.0 T and voxel size was reduced from 0.29 X 0.29 X 3.0 mm (1.5 T) to 0.15 X 0.15 X 1.5 mm (3.0 T). Total examination time (15 minutes) was similar for both systems. Two observers assessed in consensus delineation, image quality, and artifacts of anatomic landmarks (disk, bilaminar zone, capsular attachment, cortical bone) and ranked them qualitatively on a 5-point scale from 1 (optimal) to 5 (nondiagnostic). Disk position and motility was noted. For CNR analysis, signal intensity from disk and retrodiscal tissue was measured. Results: Disk position and mobility was identical at both field strengths. All anatomic landmarks were visualized significantly better at 3.0 T. In particular, the capsular attachment was depicted in more detail. Overall image quality was ranked significantly higher at 3.0 T, whereas artifact score was similar. Quantitative evaluation showed significantly higher CNR for 3.0 T (10.23 vs. 8.08, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Depiction of the normal anatomy of the TMJ benefits significantly when investing the higher SNR at 3.0 T into better spatial resolution. We anticipate that this advantage of 3.0 T MRI will also permit a more detailed analysis of capsular and disk pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 434
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
CONTRAST, RESOLUTION, AND DETECTABILITY IN MR IMAGING [J].
CONSTABLE, RT ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (02) :297-303
[2]
DEFINING THE NORMAL TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT - CLOSED-MOUTH, PARTIALLY OPEN-MOUTH, AND OPEN-MOUTH MR IMAGING OF ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS [J].
DRACE, JE ;
ENZMANN, DR .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (01) :67-71
[3]
TMJ MENISCUS AND BILAMINAR ZONE - MR IMAGING OF THE SUBSTRUCTURE - DIAGNOSTIC LANDMARKS AND PITFALLS OF INTERPRETATION [J].
DRACE, JE ;
YOUNG, SW ;
ENZMANN, DR .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (01) :73-76
[4]
COMPARISON OF MRI AND ARTHROGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH FUNCTIONAL DISTURBANCES OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT [J].
FISCHBACH, R ;
HEINDEL, W ;
LIN, Y ;
FRIEDRICH, R ;
BROCHHAGEN, HG .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1995, 162 (03) :216-223
[5]
Disk position and the bilaminar zone of the temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic young individuals by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Haiter-Neto, F ;
Hollender, L ;
Barclay, P ;
Maravilla, KR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2002, 94 (03) :372-378
[6]
MR IMAGING OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT - COMPARISON OF IMAGES OF AUTOPSY SPECIMENS MADE AT 0.3 T AND 1.5 T WITH ANATOMIC CRYOSECTIONS [J].
HANSSON, LG ;
WESTESSON, PL ;
KATZBERG, RW ;
TALLENTS, RH ;
KURITA, K ;
HOLTAS, S ;
SVENSSON, SA ;
ERIKSSON, L ;
JOHANSEN, CC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (06) :1241-1244
[7]
The depiction of the bilaminar zone of the temporomandibular joint by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Hollender, L ;
Barclay, P ;
Maravilla, K ;
Terry, V .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (01) :45-47
[8]
Hoult DI, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P46, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<46::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO
[9]
2-D
[10]
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT IMAGING [J].
KATZBERG, RW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (02) :297-307