From science to technology: The value of knowledge from different energy research institutions

被引:59
作者
Popp, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Int Affairs, Ctr Policy Res, Maxwell Sch, 426 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Public R & D; Publication data; Patent data; Citations; Solar energy; Wind energy; Biofuels; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PATENT CITATIONS; ACADEMIC INVENTORS; TECHNICAL CHANGE; INNOVATION; DIFFUSION; NETWORKS; FLOWS; COLLABORATION; LOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.011
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Expansion of public energy R&D budgets continues to be a key component of climate policy. Using an original data set of both scientific articles and patents pertaining to three alternative energy technologies (biofuels, solar and wind energy), this paper provides new evidence on the flows of knowledge between university, private sector, and government research. Better understanding of the value of knowledge from these institutions can help decision makers target R & D funds where they are most likely to be successful. I use citation data from both scientific articles and patents to answer two questions. First, what information is most useful to the development of new technology? Does high quality science lead to applied technology development? I find that this is the case, as those articles most highly cited by other scientific articles are also more likely to be cited by future patents. Second, which institutions produce the most valuable research? Are there differences across technologies? Research performed at government institutions appears to play an important translational role linking basic and applied research, as government articles are more likely to be cited by patents than any other institution, including universities. Universities play a less important role in wind research than for solar and biofuels, suggesting that wind energy research is at a more applied stage where commercialization and final product development is more important than basic research.
引用
收藏
页码:1580 / 1594
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   How Rapidly Does Science Leak Out? A Study of the Diffusion of Fundamental Ideas [J].
Adams, James D. ;
Clemmons, J. Roger .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN CAPITAL, 2013, 7 (03) :191-229
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows:: The influence of examiner citations [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2006, 88 (04) :774-779
[4]   Applicant and examiner citations in US patents: An overview and analysis [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle ;
Sampat, Bhaven .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :415-427
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, RES POLICY, V46, P1580
[6]   Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations [J].
Bacchiocchi, E. ;
Montobbio, F. .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2009, 34 (02) :169-181
[7]   International Knowledge Diffusion and Home-bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?* [J].
Bacchiocchi, Emanuele ;
Montobbio, Fabio .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2010, 112 (03) :441-470
[8]   Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology [J].
Bonaccorsi, Andrea ;
Thoma, Grid .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (06) :813-831
[9]  
Branstatter L., 2005, 11561 NBER
[10]  
Branstetter L., 2005, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, P119, DOI DOI 10.2307/20777572