SOX, compliance, and power relationships

被引:9
作者
Braganza, Ashley [1 ]
Franken, Arnoud
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Management, Ctr Org Transformat, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Management, Nexus, Bedford, England
关键词
D O I
10.1145/1284621.1284626
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Section 404 requires Chief Information Officers (CIO) to work closely with CFOs, CEOs, and the auditors for the implementation of Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) compliance in various US business organizations. The power relationship taxonomy among CFOs, CEOs, and the auditors is adapted in authority, centralization, decision rights, participation decision making, and politics, to differentiate between power and influence. The two power relationships include formal and radical, while two influence relationships are interpretive and negotiated. The names of states/provinces, based on each organization's home country of incorporation are used for SOX compliance and to identify specific individuals. The CIOs use various tactics such as knowledge building and development, innovative directive, mobilization, standardization, and subsidies, in a power relationship among CFOs, CEOs, and the auditors.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   The two sides of ROI: Return on investment vs. risk of incarceration [J].
Berghel, H .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2005, 48 (04) :15-20
[2]  
CASTELLS M, 1998, NEW POLIT ECON, V3, P473, DOI DOI 10.1080/13563469808406379
[3]  
CRA International, 2006, SARB OXL SECT 404 CO
[4]   The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983) [J].
DiMaggio, PJ ;
Powell, WW .
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 :143-166
[5]  
DONOVAN JJ, 1988, HARVARD BUS REV, V66, P134
[6]  
HALL RH, 1999, ORGANIZATIONS STRUCT
[7]   Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review [J].
Jasperson, J ;
Carte, TA ;
Saunders, CS ;
Butler, BS ;
Croes, HJP ;
Zheng, WJ .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2002, 26 (04) :397-459
[8]   INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION [J].
KING, JL ;
GURBAXANI, V ;
KRAEMER, KL ;
MCFARLAN, FW ;
RAMAN, KS ;
YAP, CS .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1994, 5 (02) :139-169
[9]   ORGANIZATIONAL POWER AND THE INFORMATION-SERVICES DEPARTMENT [J].
LUCAS, HC .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1984, 27 (01) :58-65
[10]   Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications [J].
Robey, D ;
Boudreau, MC .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (02) :167-185