Rethinking adaptation for a 4°C world

被引:207
作者
Smith, Mark Stafford [1 ]
Horrocks, Lisa [2 ]
Harvey, Alex [2 ]
Hamilton, Clive [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Harwell IBC, AEA Grp, Didcot OX11 0QR, Oxon, England
[3] Ctr Appl Philosophy & Publ Eth, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2011年 / 369卷 / 1934期
关键词
adaptation; uncertainty; decision-making; risk management; complexity; climate change; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ROBUST STRATEGIES; RISK; MANAGEMENT; DECISIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2010.0277
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
With weakening prospects of prompt mitigation, it is increasingly likely that the world will experience 4 degrees C and more of global warming. In such a world, adaptation decisions that have long lead times or that have implications playing out over many decades become more uncertain and complex. Adapting to global warming of 4 degrees C cannot be seen as a mere extrapolation of adaptation to 2 degrees C; it will be a more substantial, continuous and transformative process. However, a variety of psychological, social and institutional barriers to adaptation are exacerbated by uncertainty and long timeframes, with the danger of immobilizing decision-makers. In this paper, we show how complexity and uncertainty can be reduced by a systematic approach to categorizing the interactions between decision lifetime, the type of uncertainty in the relevant drivers of change and the nature of adaptation response options. We synthesize a number of issues previously raised in the literature to link the categories of interactions to a variety of risk-management strategies and tactics. Such application could help to break down some barriers to adaptation and both simplify and better target adaptation decision-making. The approach needs to be tested and adopted rapidly.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 216
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change [J].
Adger, W. Neil ;
Barnett, Jon .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2009, 41 (12) :2800-2805
[2]   Adapting to climate change: perspectives across scales [J].
Adger, WN ;
Arnell, NW ;
Tompkins, EL .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (02) :75-76
[3]   Beyond 'dangerous' climate change: emission scenarios for a new world [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Bows, Alice .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2011, 369 (1934) :20-44
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 13 YAL SCH FOR ENV S
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CLIM CHANG RISKS AUS
[6]  
*BASC, 2006, COMPL FOR CHAR COMM
[7]   Climate change as a predictable surprise [J].
Bazerman, Max H. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 77 (1-2) :179-193
[8]   When could global warming reach 4°C? [J].
Betts, Richard A. ;
Collins, Matthew ;
Hemming, Deborah L. ;
Jones, Chris D. ;
Lowe, Jason A. ;
Sanderson, Michael G. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2011, 369 (1934) :67-84
[9]   Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in Eastern Ontario [J].
Crabbe, P. ;
Robin, M. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 78 (01) :103-133
[10]  
Crompton T., 2009, M ENV CHALLENGES ROL