The effect of handling time on interference among house sparrows foraging at different seed densities

被引:34
作者
Johnson, CA [1 ]
Giraldeau, LA [1 ]
Grant, JWA [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
关键词
interference; encounter rate; foraging rate; handling time; house sparrows; seed density; social vigilance; aggression;
D O I
10.1163/156853901316924494
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Interference models of the ideal free distribution (IFD) assume competition among foraging animals causes intake rates to decline with increasing competitor density and that the strength of the decline influences forager distributions among food patches. However, the resulting distributions of animals may depend on which components of foraging success contribute to interference. We examined the effect of group size (1-13 birds) on the prey encounter rates, handling times, and foraging rates of house sparrows, Passer domesticus, feeding at three seed densities in a suburban backyard. House sparrows did not experience interference during search. Interference arose primarily front foraging time lost handling seeds. Foraging rates decreased with increasing seed density as a consequence of increased handling times. Also, birds experiencing significant increases in handling time with group size suffered most from interference. Our results suggest that animals adjust handling time to avoid costly aggressive interactions, indicating that handling time may be an important component of interference in some foraging systems. Future studies estimating interference should try to identify which components of foraging contribute to interference, paying particular attention to handling times for species that monitor and avoid competitors.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 614
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTIONS WHEN INDIVIDUALS DIFFER IN COMPETITIVE ABILITY - PHENOTYPE-LIMITED IDEAL FREE MODELS [J].
PARKER, GA ;
SUTHERLAND, WJ .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1986, 34 :1222-1242
[32]   THE STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE CURVES OBTAINED FROM EXPERIMENTS INVOLVING REPEATED MEASURES [J].
POTVIN, C ;
LECHOWICZ, MJ ;
TARDIF, S .
ECOLOGY, 1990, 71 (04) :1389-1400
[33]   HANDLING TIME AND CHOICE IN PIGEONS [J].
SHETTLEWORTH, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1985, 44 (02) :139-155
[34]   An evolutionarily stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups [J].
Sirot, E .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2000, 11 (04) :351-356
[35]   Modelling interference from basic foraging behaviour [J].
Stillman, RA ;
GossCustard, JD ;
Caldow, RWG .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1997, 66 (05) :692-703
[36]   Shape of the interference function in a foraging vertebrate [J].
Stillman, RA ;
GossCustard, JD ;
Clarke, RT ;
Durell, SEALD .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 65 (06) :813-824
[37]  
SUMMERSMITH JD, 1988, SPARROWS
[38]   AGGREGATION AND THE IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION [J].
SUTHERLAND, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1983, 52 (03) :821-828
[39]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONTINUOUS INPUT AND INTERFERENCE MODELS OF IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTIONS WITH UNEQUAL COMPETITORS [J].
SUTHERLAND, WJ ;
PARKER, GA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1992, 44 (02) :345-355
[40]   Interference and the ideal free distribution: Models and tests [J].
Tregenza, T ;
Parker, GA ;
Thompson, DJ .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (04) :379-386