When disagreement gets ugly: Perceptions of bias and the escalation of conflict

被引:106
作者
Kennedy, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Pronin, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
bias; objectivity; interpersonal perception; disagreement; conflict;
D O I
10.1177/0146167208315158
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is almost a truism that disagreement produces conflict. This article suggests that perceptions of bias can drive this relationship. First, these studies show that people perceive those who disagree with them as biased. Second, they show that the conflict-escalating approaches that people take toward those who disagree with them are mediated by people's tendency to perceive those who disagree with them as biased. Third, these studies manipulate the mediator and show that experimental manipulations that prompt people to perceive adversaries as biased lead them to respond more conflictually-and that such responding causes those who engage in it to be viewed as more biased and less worthy of cooperative gestures. In summary, this article provides evidence for a "bias-perception conflict spiral," whereby people who disagree perceive each other as biased, and those perceptions in turn lead them to take conflict-escalating actions against each other ( which in turn engender further perceptions of bias, continuing the spiral).
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 848
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Blake R.R., 1964, MANAGERIAL GRID
[2]   Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs [J].
Cohen, GL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (05) :808-822
[3]   MODEL OF EGOTISTICAL RELATIVE DEPRIVATION [J].
CROSBY, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1976, 83 (02) :85-113
[4]   TOWARD A THEORY OF REVOLUTION [J].
DAVIES, JC .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 27 (01) :5-19
[5]   Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement [J].
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Beersma, Bianca ;
Stroebe, Katherine ;
Euwema, Martin C. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 90 (06) :927-943
[6]   Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation [J].
De Dreu, CKW ;
Carnevale, PJ .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 35, 2003, 35 :235-291
[7]  
Deutsch M., 1973, RESOLUTION CONFLICT
[8]   Peering into the bias blind spot: People's assessments of bias in themselves and others [J].
Ehrlinger, J ;
Gilovich, T ;
Ross, L .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (05) :680-692
[9]   When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction [J].
Epley, Nicholas ;
Caruso, Eugene M. ;
Bazerman, Max H. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (05) :872-889
[10]   I AM being fair: The bias blind spot as a stumbling block to seeing both sides [J].
Frantz, CM .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 28 (02) :157-167