The effects of donor and recipient practices on transplant center finances

被引:58
作者
Englesbe, M. J. [1 ]
Ads, Y. [1 ]
Cohn, J. A. [1 ]
Sonnenday, C. J. [1 ]
Lynch, R. [1 ]
Sung, R. S. [1 ]
Pelletier, S. J. [1 ]
Birkmeyer, J. D. [1 ]
Punch, J. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Delayed graft function (DGF); economic analysis; expanded criteria donors; kidney transplantation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02098.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Over the past several years we have noted a marked decrease in this profitability of our kidney transplant program. Our hypothesis is that this reduction in kidney transplant institutional profitability is related to aggressive donor and recipient practices. The study population included all adults with Medicare insurance who received a kidney transplant at our center between 1999 and 2005. Adopting the hospital perspective, multi-variate linear regression models to determine the independent effects of donor and recipient characteristics and era effects on total reimbursements and total hospital margin. We note statistically significant decreased medical center incremental margins in cases with ECDs (-$5887) and in cases of DGF (-4937). We also note an annual change in the medical center margin is independently associated with year and changes at a rate of -$5278 per year, related to both increasing costs and decreasing Medicare reimbursements. The financial loss associated with patient DGF and the use of ECD kidneys may resonate with other centers, and could hinder efforts to expand kidney transplantation within the United States. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should consider risk-adjusted reimbursement for kidney transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 592
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1995-2004 [J].
Cohen, DJ ;
St Martin, L ;
Christensen, LL ;
Bloom, RD ;
Sung, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) :1153-1169
[2]   Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994-2003 [J].
Danovitch, GM ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Weir, MR ;
Stock, PG ;
Bennett, WM ;
Christensen, LL ;
Sung, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) :904-915
[3]   Should we discard the renal allografts from cardiac death donors that have total ischemic time longer than 24 hours? [J].
Hayakawa, K. ;
Kubota, Y. ;
Sasaki, H. ;
Kusaka, M. ;
Maruyama, T. ;
Shiroki, R. ;
Hoshinaga, K. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (10) :3382-3383
[4]  
HIRTH RA, 2007, J AM SOC NEPHROL
[5]  
HIRTH RA, 2007, INT J HLTH CARE FINL
[6]   Should we discard the graft? Analysis of the renal grafts with a total ischemia time of more than 24 hours donated after cardiac death [J].
Kubota, Y. ;
Hayakawa, K. ;
Sasaki, H. ;
Kusaka, M. ;
Maruyama, T. ;
Shiroki, R. ;
Hoshinaga, K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (05) :1177-1180
[7]   Organ donation and utilization, 1995-2004: Entering the collaborative era [J].
Marks, WH ;
Wagner, D ;
Pearson, TC ;
Orlowski, JP ;
Nelson, PW ;
McGowan, JJ ;
Guidinger, MK ;
Burdick, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) :1101-1110
[8]   Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Ashby, VB ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Distant, DA ;
Hulbert-Shearon, TE ;
Metzger, RA ;
Ojo, AO ;
Port, FK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (21) :2726-2733
[9]   Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1996-2005 [J].
Punch, J. D. ;
Hayes, D. H. ;
LaPorte, F. B. ;
McBride, V. ;
Seely, M. S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (05) :1327-1338
[10]   Surgeon contribution to hospital bottom line - Not all are created equal [J].
Resnick, AS ;
Corrigan, D ;
Mullen, JL ;
Kaiser, LR .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (04) :530-539