Expression of behavioral sensitization to ethanol by DBA/2J mice: the role of NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors

被引:43
作者
Broadbent, J [1 ]
Kampmueller, KM [1 ]
Koonse, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Div Substance Abuse, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
sensitization; locomotor activity; ethanol; glutamate; DBA/2J mice;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-003-1404-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Behavioral sensitization has been accorded a central role in contemporary theories of drug addiction. Accordingly, a substantial effort has been made to determine the processes mediating sensitization to psychostimulants. However, few studies have examined the mechanisms underlying sensitization to ethanol. Objectives: Experiments were conducted to assess the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA glutamate receptors in expression of sensitization to ethanol's locomotor stimulant effects. Methods: Sensitization was induced in DBA/2 J mice by administering ethanol (2 g/kg) intraperitoneally (i.p.) before four activity trials. Control groups were given saline (12.5 ml/kg i.p.) before each activity trial. Subsequently, the effects of two NMDA receptor antagonists, MK-801 and ifenprodil, and two non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists, DNQX and GYKI 52466, were assessed on expression of the sensitized locomotor response. Results: MK-801 reduced the stimulant effects of ethanol and completely prevented expression of sensitization at doses exceeding 0.075 mg/kg. In contrast, although ifenprodil also reduced the stimulant effects of ethanol, the antagonist did not alter expression of sensitization. Non-NMDA glutamate antagonists were more consistent in their effects on sensitization. DNQX reduced the magnitude of the sensitized response at a low dose that did not alter the stimulant effects of ethanol. The more selective AMPA antagonist GYKI 52466 reduced the stimulant effects of ethanol and completely blocked expression of sensitization. Conclusions: The results provide initial evidence to suggest that both NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors play a role in expression of sensitization to ethanol. Additional research will be required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying differences in the efficacy of glutamate antagonists.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 234
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   PERSISTENCE OF CHRONIC MORPHINE EFFECTS UPON ACTIVITY IN RATS 8 MONTHS AFTER CEASING TREATMENT [J].
BABBINI, M ;
GAIARDI, M ;
BARTOLETTI, M .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1975, 14 (08) :611-614
[2]   PREABSORPTIVE VS POSTABSORPTIVE CONTROL OF ETHANOL INTAKE IN C57BL-6J AND DBA-2J MICE [J].
BELKNAP, JK ;
BELKNAP, ND ;
BERG, JH ;
COLEMAN, R .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1977, 7 (06) :413-425
[3]   AMPA receptor agonists, antagonists and modulators: their potential for clinical utility [J].
Bigge, CF ;
Nikam, SS .
EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 1997, 7 (10) :1099-1114
[4]   Activity of 2,3-benzodiazepines at native rat and recombinant human glutamate receptors in vitro: Stereospecificity and selectivity profiles [J].
Bleakman, D ;
Ballyk, BA ;
Schoepp, DD ;
Palmer, AJ ;
Bath, CP ;
Sharpe, EF ;
Woolley, ML ;
Bufton, HR ;
Kamboj, RK ;
Tarnawa, I ;
Lodge, D .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 35 (12) :1689-1702
[5]   Differential effects of GABAA and GABAB agonists on sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in DBA/2 J mice [J].
Broadbent, J ;
Harless, WE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 141 (02) :197-205
[6]  
Broadbent J., 1997, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V23, P2389
[7]   Dizocilpine (MK-801) prevents the development of sensitization to ethanol in DBA/2J mice [J].
Broadbent, J ;
Weitemier, AZ .
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 1999, 34 (03) :283-288
[8]   THE ANTICONVULSANT EFFECT OF THE NON-NMDA ANTAGONISTS, NBQX AND GYKI-52466, IN MICE [J].
CHAPMAN, AG ;
SMITH, SE ;
MELDRUM, BS .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1991, 9 (02) :92-96
[9]   Cocaine sensitization and craving: Differing roles for dopamine and glutamate in the nucleus accumbens [J].
Cornish, JL ;
Kalivas, PW .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2001, 20 (03) :43-54
[10]   Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect [J].
Cunningham, CL ;
Tull, LE ;
Rindal, KE ;
Meyer, PJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 160 (04) :414-424