The dynamic self: How the content and structure of the self-concept change with mood

被引:76
作者
Showers, CJ [1 ]
Abramson, LY [1 ]
Hogan, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.478
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Change in the content and structure of the self-concept was examined in a 2-year prospective study of depression. A self-descriptive card-sorting task measured the self-concepts of participants who were either high or low in cognitive vulnerability to depression at 2 times, once when their mood was low and once when it was not. Analyses examined change in the positive and negative content of the self-concept and in 3 features of self-structure: differential importance, compartmentalization, and self-complexity. Findings suggest that change in the content of the self-concept simply reflects life circumstances, whereas change in self-structure may help to counteract stress and negative mood.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 493
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]   CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBILITY AND CLINICAL DEPRESSION - A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION [J].
GOTLIB, IH ;
CANE, DB .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 96 (03) :199-204
[22]   SELF-SCHEMAS AND RISK FOR DEPRESSION - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HAMMEN, C ;
MARKS, T ;
DEMAYO, R ;
MAYOL, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 49 (05) :1147-1159
[23]   DO SELF-ATTRIBUTES FORM A COGNITIVE STRUCTURE [J].
HIGGINS, ET ;
VANHOOK, E ;
DORFMAN, D .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 1988, 6 (03) :177-207
[24]  
Kovacs M., 1977, DEPRESSION CHILDHOOD
[25]  
KUIPER NA, 1988, COGNITIVE PROCESSES
[26]   SELF-COMPLEXITY AND AFFECTIVE EXTREMITY - DONT PUT ALL OF YOUR EGGS IN ONE COGNITIVE BASKET [J].
LINVILLE, PW .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 1985, 3 (01) :94-120
[28]  
MARGOLIN J, 1998, UNPUB MANIPULATING S
[29]   THE DYNAMIC SELF-CONCEPT - A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
MARKUS, H ;
WURF, E .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 38 :299-337
[30]   STABILITY AND MALLEABILITY OF THE SELF-CONCEPT [J].
MARKUS, H ;
KUNDA, Z .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (04) :858-866